Essay for you

Critical Thinking 22 Rifle

Category: Critical thinking


Jack O Connor Medium Bore Woods Rifle

The Jack O'Connor Medium Bore Woods Rifle

In my youth, much of what I learned about rifles, cartridges and big game hunting came from reading Jack O'Connor's columns and feature articles in Outdoor Life magazine. His experience, practical knowledge and critical thinking about rifles and their use has never been equalled. Thus, when someone dusts off one of his ideas, it piques my interest.

One such idea was for a medium bore rifle cartridge of moderate recoil. The O'Connor concept has been summarized by Chuck Hawks in Guns and Shooting Online as follows, from The 338 Marlin Express: A Proposal :

"Sometime after World War II Jack O'Connor, the Dean of American gun writers, proposed a new .33 caliber cartridge. He wanted to drive a 200 grain flat point or round nose bullet at a muzzle velocity (MV) of 2400-2450 f.p.s. O'Connor's concept was a medium bore cartridge with moderate recoil that the average woods and brush hunter could use for shooting deer, feral hogs, black bear and possibly elk. If the new cartridge's recoil could be kept below 20 ft. lbs, the average deer hunter could take advantage of its benefits."

Jack O'Connor suggested using the 7x57mm Mauser case, necked up to .33 or .35 caliber, as the basis for such a cartridge and left it at that. O'Connor made this suggestion before the introduction of the .308 Winchester and the resulting popularity of the modern short action rifle. Unfortunately, the 7x57's cartridge overall length is a bit too long to be adaptable to short action rifles, limiting the available action choices. However, Chuck Hawks fleshed-out O'Connor's concept in some detail in his article The .338x57 O'Connor .

Chuck then recounts how, after the advent of the .308 Winchester cartridge, there were missed opportunities to create a woods cartridge incorporating O'Connor's idea when the .358 Winchester, the .356 Winchester and .338 Federal were developed. In all three cases, the cartridges were factory loaded for the maximum muzzle velocity available.

The problem with this, in terms of the O'Connor concept, was that these cartridges all produced recoil levels well above the deer rifle level. Speed sells in the cartridge world, but sometimes it can be too much of a good thing, with undesirable side effects, especially excessive recoil and muzzle blast.

Then, in 2007, Hornady introduced a new cartridge, the .308 Marlin Express, and Marlin produced a version of their Model 336 lever action rifle for it. The .308 Marlin Express was designed to use a 160 grain bullet and produce ballistics very close to those of the .308 Winchester.

To Hawks, the .308 Marlin Express case looked like a natural to neck-up to fire .338 bullets fitting the weight/velocity/recoil profile envisioned by Jack O'Connor over half a century earlier. Accordingly, he wrote his article The 338 Marlin Express: A Proposal. in which he suggested a ".338 Marlin Express" to shoot 200 grain bullets at a MV of 2400 to 2450 f.p.s, and sent it along to Hornady and Marlin.

The 338 Marlin Express arrives. Or not

Hornady and Marlin did, indeed, develop a .338 Marlin Express cartridge and rifle package. Marlin tweaked the Model 336 platform to fire the Hornady designed cartridge and the resulting rifle was designated the Model 338MXLR.

However, the cartridge was not a necked-up .308 Marlin Express, but was instead based on the .376 Steyr cartridge. The critical difference being that the new .338 Marlin Express case was .028 inches larger in diameter at the base than the .308 Marlin Express case, thus increasing powder capacity. The purpose of the fatter case was to, once again, wring maximum velocity out of the new cartridge.

The factory load uses a 200 grain Hornady FTX bullet at an advertised muzzle velocity of 2565 f.p.s. and muzzle energy of 2921 ft. lbs. from a 24 inch barrel. Conservatively estimating a 50.5 grain powder charge is needed to drive a 200 grain bullet at that speed, the recoil energy would be about 22.5 ft. lbs. in a 338MXLR rifle. Ouch! Darn!

However, suppose a reloader reduces the MV to about 2365 f.p.s, which is the velocity the factory load achieves at 100 yards. This would create a new ball game for the cartridge in terms of recoil and terminal performance.

To compute recoil, I assumed a field equipped rifle weight of 8.25 pounds and I also assumed a powder charge of 49.3 grains of H414 powder. This yields a MV of 2364 f.p.s. with a 200-grain .338 bullet, so that is what I used. These input data yield a recoil value of 19.9 ft. lbs. a MPBR (+/- 3 inches) of 234 yards and retained energy of 1723 ft. lbs. at MPBR.

Is this the woods rifle cartridge envisioned by Jack O'Connor and championed by Chuck Hawks? It would seem so, given the variables involved. MV is below 2400 f.p.s. but not enough to matter, given the MPBR and terminal ballistics produced, along with an acceptable recoil value. Plus, the cartridge is chambered in a classic lever action rifle.

However, I hear a disembodied voice saying, "Houston, we have a problem; the rifle does not work correctly." A Guns and Shooting Online review of the rifle/cartridge combo shortly after its introduction found serious functioning problems. The complete review, Marlin Model 338MXLR .338 Express Rifle. details these. Unfortunately, this was not an isolated case. Other reviews also sharply criticized the fit, finish and, most importantly, function of the rifles.

I do not want to get into a digression about the problems that have plagued Marlin firearms since its acquisition in 2007 by Remington Arms. Co. Rather, focusing specifically on the 338MXLR rifle, I will only say that there are two likely reasons for the bad reputation the rifle has gained.

First, the geometry of the .338 Marlin Express cartridge is only marginally compatible with the Marlin 336 platform. In particular, the large diameter of the case makes for a very tight fit in the receiver, which might help explain the reported feeding problems.

Second, when Remington acquired Marlin, they closed the existing Marlin facilities and moved production to new locations, with new management and production personnel, but using the old, worn production equipment. Marlin rifles produced under these conditions have had poor fit, finish and function across the board, according to numerous reviews and complaints. As things stand, the .338 Marlin Express cartridge is not viable, because the only commercial rifle made for it has potential functioning issues.

Renewing the search

Given that the .338 Marlin Express is perhaps not the answer to the question at hand, I rebooted. To guide a renewed look at possible fits for the O'Connor woods rifle concept, I broadened the criteria slightly, as follows.

  • Caliber. 308 to .358 (.338 caliber preferred)
  • Bullet weight: Approx. 200 gr. (195-225 gr.); RN preferred
  • Muzzle velocity: Between 2300 and 2500 f.p.s.
  • Maximum point blank range (+/- 3 in.): Between 215 and 250 yards
  • Recoil of field equipped rifle: 20 ft. lbs. or less
  • Cartridge should be effective on deer, feral hogs, black bear, elk and moose
  • Rifle action: Primarily lever or bolt (autoloading or pump possible)

I think that I only need to comment on the first and last of these criteria. O'Connor's concept called for a 200 grain. 338 or .358 inch diameter bullet. However, I felt it would be reasonable to expand the parameters to include .30-.32 caliber and a somewhat wider MV range, as indicated above.

Concerning rifle action type, I grew up with lever action 30-30 deer rifles, so a lever action just seems right to me for a woods rifle. However, over a lifetime of deer hunting, I have taken more deer with bolt action rifles than with lever actions and I have never felt at a disadvantage when using a bolt rifle. Autoloaders or pump actions are limited alternatives, for reasons I will note later. With those parameters set, here is what I found when I renewed the search for a woods rifle/cartridge package.

Although O'Connor's concept was for a medium bore rifle, I wanted to see what the possibilities were for a .308 caliber rifle to meet the other criteria. The .308 is a true short action cartridge, making it ideal for a handy woods rifle, as its receiver can be about 1/2 inch shorter than a receiver for a standard length cartridge, such as the .30-06. Here is what can be done if the .308 Winchester is loaded with our woods rifle parameters in mind.

Hodgdon lists a load with 42.7 grains of IMR 4166 powder under a 200-grain Swift A-Frame semi-spitzer bullet. In a Browning BLR rifle with 20-inch barrel, this load would achieve a MV of 2452 f.p.s. and a MPBR of 243 yards with 1771 ft. lbs. of retained energy. Recoil in a 7.75 pound field weight rifle would be 20.3 ft. lbs.

I was surprised at the performance of this load. I have always thought that the .308 Win. is at its best with 150 or 165 grain bullets and no more than adequate with 180 grain bullets. I had never really looked at it in terms of throwing a 200 grain bullet. However, this load has quite respectable MPBR and retained energy values. This all comes out of the relatively light weight (6.5 pounds) 20-inch barreled Browning BLR rifle, with a level of recoil just 1.5 percent above the 20 ft. lb. target value. Reduce the MV to 2400 fps and the recoil drops below the 20 ft. lb. limit.

If the .308 Winchester is good, then the 30-06 must be better and indeed it is. A load with 45.2 grains of IMR 4166 powder and a 200-grain Speer spitzer bullet is listed by Hodgdon. This load yields a MV of 2456 f.p.s. a MPBR of 248 yards and retained energy of 1934 ft. lbs. at MPBR. This is in a 22-inch barreled Browning BLR rifle, generating 19.2 ft. lbs. of recoil with a rifle field weight of 8.5 pounds, but many bolt action rifles of similar weight and barrel length are available. Clearly, this load is more than adequate for all Class 2 game, plus it is capable for Class 3 critters up to the size of moose.

The 8mm Mauser uses a .323 inch diameter bullet, the largest of the standard small bore bullet diameters. Like the .30-06, it requires a standard length action. Norma offers factory loads using their various 196 grain bullets at a MV of 2395 fps and reloaders can essentially duplicate these loads using 195-200 grain bullets from Hornady, Speer and others. The MPBR is approximately 240 yards and such loads have proven deadly on Class 2 and Class 3 game around the world.

According to the Speer Reloading Manual #14. a 200 grain Speer spitzer bullet in front of 54.0 grains of IMR 4831 powder yields a MV of 2395 fps. The recoil energy of this load is about 19.1 ft. lbs. when fired in an eight pound rifle.

New 8x57mm rifles are not common in the US, but a few are offered by European manufacturers. Much more common on this side of the pond are surplus military rifles using Mauser 98 actions and used "sporterized" versions of the same. The quality and condition of these rifles varies from excellent to "wall hanger only." Buyer beware.

Starting with the idea of a .338 caliber, 200 grain bullet, I first focused on the .338 Federal cartridge, which is a short action cartridge based on a necked-up .308 case. The Federal Fusion load is my point of reference. Federal lists this load at 2700 f.p.s. from a 24-inch barrel, but I deducted 20 f.p.s. from this (see The Rifle Barrel ) to adjust the MV for a 22-inch barrel, which is a more practical length for our purposes.

The key variable I wanted to establish for this factory load was recoil. I assumed a field equipped rifle weight of 8.25 pounds (starting with a seven pound rifle and adding a conservative 1-1/4 pounds for scope, sling and cartridges). The estimated recoil of this package would be 22.6 ft. lbs.

This factory load yields a level of recoil thirteen percent above the target value of 20 ft. lbs, so the cartridge needs to be loaded down to meet the recoil goal. I turned to online load data resources to find a load that would balance the bullet weight/velocity/MPBR/recoil parameters I had established.

Nosler lists a .338 Federal load of 45.0 grains of Hodgdon Varget powder under the 200 grain Nosler AccuBond tipped/boat tail bullet. Adjusting the published MV of this load for a 22 inch rifle barrel, the MV would be 2463 f.p.s. Recoil calculates at 19.8 ft. lbs. with an 8.25 pound rifle (field weight). MPBR would be 242 yards with 1731 ft. lbs. of retained energy. These numbers fit our woods rifle parameters.

Currently, Savage offers virtually the only readily available commercial rifles chambered for the .338 Federal cartridge. At present, Savage offers six variations of their Model 110 bolt action in .338 Federal. Of these, the Model 16 FCSS Weather Warrior, which comes with a 22-inch barrel, would be my first choice.

Shaw Precision Guns (a.k.a. E.R. Shaw Barrels) will build their Mk. VII rifle to your specifications. They offer a wide range of barrel options and walnut, laminated hardwood or synthetic stocks. The Shaw rifles are built on Savage 10/110 bolt actions and come with the excellent Savage AccuTrigger. A Mk. VII rifle will run from $775 to $1250, depending on the options selected. You can build your rifle on their website ( and immediately submit the specs for a price quote. Guns and Shooting Online has requested a Shaw rifle in .338 Federal caliber for a future review.

The dark horse. 338-06 A-Square

The .338-06 intrigues me. Many decades ago, wildcatters created it by simply necking-up the .30-06 case to accept .338 caliber bullets. In 1998, the cartridge was SAMMI standardized as the .338-06 A-Square, but then the bullet and cartridge company that had it standardized went out of business. I guess its current status is that it is a standardized, orphaned wildcat, if that makes sense.

I wanted to look at it here, because it is the only notable non-magnum .338 cartridge that has not been covered. I knew the .338-06 could be loaded to performance levels approaching the .338 Ruger Compact Magnum, but can it be loaded down to perform within my woods rifle parameters? Yes, it can.

I chose a 23-inch barrel for the .338-06. I vacillated over the barrel length, unable to decide whether a 22 or 24 inch barrel would make more sense. Finally, I split the difference, since getting a .338-06 would require a custom barrel in any event.

A load load using 44.0 grains of Hodgdon H335 powder and a 210 grain Nosler Partition spitzer bullet yields a MV of 2448 f.p.s. and a MPBR of 240 yards, with 1764 ft. lbs. of retained energy at that distance. Recoil in a 8.75 pound rifle would be 19.5 ft. lbs. (44.0 grains of H335 is listed as a starting load by Hodgdon.)

Just for fun, I checked out what the cartridge would do with a 225 grain bullet. Nosler data shows that a 225 grain Partition bullet over 45.5 grains of IMR 4320 powder generates a MV of 2311 f.p.s. in a 23-inch barrel. This yields a MPBR of 230 yards with 1842 ft. lbs. of retained energy. Nosler notes that this was the most accurate load they tested with 225 grain bullets in the .338-06. Recoil of this load in an 8.75 pound rifle is 20.2 ft. lbs.

To my knowledge, no commercial rifle maker currently offers a .338-06 rifle, although Weatherby did when A-Square was still offering factory loaded ammunition. If you want a .338-06 today, there are basically three ways to get there. First, you can have a barrel built for a .30-06 action you already have. Second, you can order a semi-custom rifle from Shaw Precision Guns. Finally, you can have a true custom rifle built.

As explained in the .338 Federal section above, semi-custom Shaw Mk. VII rifles are available with a nice range of options and will run from $775 to $1250. I used the "build your rifle" function on the E.R. Shaw website ( for a .338-06 rifle in matte stainless steel, with a 23 inch sporter weight barrel and laminated stock. I got back a price quote via e-mail the same day, for just over $900 including shipping to my FFL. The only caveat in the Shaw deal is that they are not into instant gratification. The e-mail I got from them noted that, "The average turnaround time on a Mk. VII rifle build is in the 12 month area."

Like the .338 Federal, the .358 Winchester is a short action cartridge based on a necked-up .308 case. For our purposes, the two cartridges are essentially equal, as with medium pressure loads both can drive a 200 grain bullet at 2400 fps from the muzzle of a 20 or 22 inch barrel, the perfect load for a Jack O'Connor woods rifle. Both, of course, are factory loaded to higher velocity (and hence recoil) than we desire.

I had never paid much attention to the .358 Winchester, having formed the impression that it was no more than a step beyond the 35 Remington. However, I thought I should look at it for this project and I was pleasantly surprised with what I found.

Hornady lists a factory load featuring their 200 grain spire point bullet. Adjusting the muzzle velocity for a Browning BLR rifle with 20 inch barrel gives a MV of 2435 f.p.s. MPBR of 229 yards and retained energy of 1450 ft. lbs. at that range. Estimated recoil of this load in a 7.75 pound field weight rifle is 21.8 ft. lbs.

The .358 Win. has a longer MPBR and greater retained energy than I had anticipated. Recoil of the factory round is nine percent above the target value of 20 ft. lbs, which is undesirable. However, the recoil can be reduced to acceptable limits by either modestly lowering the velocity of the 200 grain bullet, or by going to a heavier bullet, driven slower.

In the former case, 43.1 grains of IMR 3031 powder should drive a 200 grain Hornady InterLock round-nosed bullet at about 2340 f.p.s. from the BLR's 20" barrel. This drops the recoil to a calculated 16.8 ft. lbs. with some sacrifice in trajectory, but it should still serve nicely as a brush-busting load.

Alternatively, using what is listed by Hodgdon as a starting load of 42.0 grains of H4895 powder under a 225 grain Sierra GameKing bullet, the MV is only 2183 f.p.s. out of a 20 inch barrel. However, the retained energy at 225 yards (10 yards beyond the MPBR of this load) of this low drag spitzer/boat tail bullet is 1516 ft. lbs, which is 66 ft. lbs. more than for the 200 grain factory load. Recoil energy is 20.1 ft. lbs.

Since the .358 cartridge is offered in the excellent Browning BLR rifle, it merits consideration for our woods rifle. It does not have quite the MPBR and retained energy numbers of the other cartridges in this article, but it is a legitimate 200 yard slugger (1597 ft. lbs. of energy) with a 220-225 grain bullet. Realistically, what more does one need?

The .35 Whelen was devised around 1922 by necking up the .30-06 case to accept .358 caliber bullets. It remained a popular wildcat until it was standardized by Remington in 1988. In the days before the wide distribution of bolt action rifles with magnum length actions that would accept the "Queen of Medium Bores," the .375 H&H, the .35 Whelen was sort of the poor man's alternative in a powerful medium bore cartridge.

The .338-06 and .35 Whelen are both standard length cartridges based on necked-up .30-06 cases with the same shoulder angle and identical powder capacity to the base of the shoulder. Both are typically loaded with bullets in the 180-250 grain range, so the two cartridges are very similar in application and capability. The .338-06 has the advantage in sectional density with any given bullet weight, while the .35 Whelen has the advantage in cross-sectional area. (For a full comparison, see Compared: North American Medium Bore Rifle Cartridges .

Like the .338-06, the .35 Whelen can be loaded down to drive a 200 grain bullet at 2400 fps. For example, the Hornady Handbook shows a MV of 2400 fps from a 22 inch barrel with 50.5 grains of H4895 powder and a 200 grain bullet. In an eight pound rifle, the recoil energy of that load is 18.4 ft. lbs. At 2400 fps with a RN bullet, the MPBR is about 211 yards.

In terms of the O'Connor woods rifle concept, there is little to choose between the .338-06 and .35 Whelen. If loaded to the same velocity with the same weight bullet and fired in rifles of the same weight with the same length barrels, the recoil of the two cartridges will be virtually indistinguishable. Ditto their effectiveness on Class 2 and Class 3 game.

Compared to the .358 Winchester, the .35 Whelen, with its roughly 10% larger case, requires more powder to achieve a given velocity with the same weight bullet and therefore kicks a little harder. Since both cartridges can drive a 200 grain bullet at 2400 fps from a 22 inch barrel, for our purposes the .358 would seem to have a modest advantage in lower recoil. If both cartridges are loaded with the same bullets at the same velocity, the trajectory and MPBR will, of course, be identical.

New and used commercial rifles are available in .35 Whelen, as Remington offered it in their Model 700 line for many years and a few other rifle makers have also occasionally chambered for the cartridge. There are certainly more .35 Whelen rifles available today than .338-06 rifles and probably more than for the .358 Win. However, the .35 Whelen has never been a strong seller and rifles so chambered are not thick on the ground. The situation is better in factory loaded ammunition, as among the Big Four, Remington, Hornady and Federal offer .35 Whelen ammo.

Autoloading and pump actions

The application of these action types is quite limited in both model and cartridge terms. The only models available are the Benelli R1, Browning BAR Mk. II, Merkel SR1 and Remington 750 autoloaders, plus the Remington 7600 pump action. Among these, the only available cartridges among our brush rifle candidates are .308 Win. and .30-06. I do not know what more to say.

I learned some things from this exercise. I will group my conclusions by the calibers of the cartridges covered.

The Small Bores (.30 to 8mm caliber). If one already has a rifle chambered for 8x57. 30-06 or .308 Winchester, then an adequate woods load can be built using the recipes I listed above, or something similar. If I were buying a dedicated woods rifle, I would think first of a Browning BLR in either .308 or .30-06.

It is perhaps worth noting that the only cartridge considered in this article for which factory ammunition is loaded to our approximate bullet weight, velocity and potential recoil specifications is the 8x57. All of the other cartridges must be reloaded to meet our standards. Unfortunately, although closer than a .30 caliber bullet, the .32 caliber 8x57 is still not a medium bore caliber.

.338 caliber. I think it would be great if Browning were to chamber the BLR in .338 Federal, with a 22-inch barrel. Then, someone should offer a factory loaded cartridge with a 200 grain bullet at a MV of 2400 to 2450 f.p.s. Call it the ".338 Federal O'Connor Special" and shooters would pay attention. I cannot think of a rifle/cartridge combination that would better fit the medium bore woods rifle concept.

Perhaps Remington will get their Marlin line straightened out and produce a Model 336 variant that functions reliably with the .338 Marlin Express cartridge. In that case, this promising rifle/cartridge combination would be back in the game.

Failing either of the above, a Savage 16 or Shaw Mk. VII rifle with a 22 inch barrel in .338 Federal would make a very good woods rifle. The cartridge just needs to be hand loaded to meet the recoil limitation.

The .338-06 should not be overlooked. This versatile cartridge can be loaded down to woods rifle performance levels, or loaded up to rival the .338 Ruger Compact Magnum and .350 Remington Magnum in killing power. Shaw offers their Mk. VII rifle, which can be tailored for specific applications, in the caliber.

.358 caliber. I had ignored the .358 Winchester cartridge, but I am over that now. A .358 Browning BLR is a potent woods rifle when firing 200-225 grain bullets hand loaded to not exceed our 20 ft. lb. recoil limit. Two G&S Online staff members own .358 Win. rifles and can testify that the fat bullet has excellent terminal effect.

The .35 Whelen could also serve as the basis for an O'Connor woods rifle, but other things being equal, it must always kick a little harder than the .358 Win. In addition, the standard length receiver of a .35 Whelen rifle will normally be about 1/2 inch longer than the short action required for the .358 Win. Shorter is usually better for a woods rifle. Either cartridge must be hand loaded with medium velocity loads to meet our recoil limitation and then the external ballistics become identical in velocity, energy and trajectory.

I cannot help but wonder how Jack O'Connor would weigh in on the cartridges that more or less fit the concept of the woods rifle he conceived so long ago. I have a feeling he would endorse one of the medium bores and say, "Why did this take so long?"

Other articles

Critical hit - XCOM Wiki

Critical hit Contents Overview Edit

When firing most weapons. units have a chance to inflict additional damage (+50%, rounded down to the nearest whole number) upon their opponent with a critical hit. A unit's Critical Hit Damage and Critical Hit Chance stats are partially composed of base stats added by the weapon being used, but may vary from encounter to encounter due to many factors established by both the shooter and the intended victim. These include both party's pertinent traits. abilities. status effects. gene mods. equipment & upgrades. as well as the positioning of the units. Catching a target out of cover (referred to as "Enemy Exposed" in-game), or flanking from an unprotected side, increases the chance of a critical hit by +50%.

Hit Chance Edit

The critical percent displayed in-game indicates the chance of a successful hit being critical. not the chance of landing a critical hit against the opponent. To determine the latter, multiply the displayed chance to hit by the critical percentage. For example, if you have a 88% chance to hit the target, and a 25% critical chance, the percent outcomes are:

  • Chance to hit (with critical damage): 88% × .25 = 22%
  • Chance to hit (with regular damage): 88% - 22% = 66%
  • Chance to miss: 100% - 22% - 66% = 12%

Also note that while Aim and Defense modify the chance of a hit, they are not directly related to Critical Hit Chance or Critical Hit Damage stats.

Weapons Edit

Most weapons, excluding rocket launchers and grenades. are capable of inflicting a critical hit. Of all the primary weapon types, sniper rifles have the highest base chance to inflict a critical hit throughout the game, increasing by +5% critical chance with each technology level. Heavy's LMGs have the lowest critical chance, remaining at zero from conventional weapon through to plasma. The Laser Pistol is the only secondary weapon that has a base chance to critically hit.

Critical Hit - MechWarrior Online Wiki

Critical Hit

An armored 'Mech will not be vulnerable to critical hits

A critical hit is defined as damage to equipment that takes up critical space. This can cause that particular item to be destroyed before the section it is housed in is itself destroyed. A critical hit is equal in damage to the hit that scored the critical damage. It is only possible to deal critical damage to a area that is no longer protected by armor. Once the armor is removed, and internal structure begins to take damage, there is a chance that a critical hit can be achieved. When the internal structure does take damage though, that same damage might also be applied to one of the pieces of equipment installed there up to three times. The odds for a particular piece of equipment taking a critical hit depends on how many critical spaces it takes up and how much critical space is occupied by other pieces of equipment.

Notification of Critical Damage Edit

When your 'Mech takes critical damage, you will see a large warning on your screen like this one:

Knowing when you deal a critical hit requires closer attention. If you manage to destroy an enemies ammunition bin, you may see a secondary explosion come from within the section after you damaged it. In this case, further damage will be dealt to the location it is housed in and possibly to the adjacent section.

If you destroy an enemies weapon, you might see the weapon displayed in red on your HUD even though the section it is housed in is still intact.

Calculating the Odds Edit Odds of taking/dealing a critical hit Edit

Some areas are missing armor and may take critical damage. Areas with armor remaining still will not take critical damage though.

Most weapons have a less than even chance of dealing critical damage. In most cases, damage that is dealt to internal structure has a 42% chance of dealing additional critical damage.

  • Each hit to the internal structure for most weapons have the odds of doing the following amounts of damage:
  • A 25% chance of the damage also causing 1 critical hit.
  • A 14% chance of the damage also causing 2 critical hits.
  • A 3% chance of the damage also causing 3 critical hits.

Since each critical hit is equal to the hit that achieve the critical damage, it is possible to magnify the damage of your weapon many times over.

Some weapons have a much greater chance of achieving a critical hit. Machine Guns. Flamers. and LB 10-X Autocannons have a 2 in 3 chance of dealing at least one critical hit.

  • Each hit by these weapons to the internal structure has the odds of doing the following amounts of damage:
  • A 39% chance of damage also causing 1 critical hit.
  • A 22% chance of damage also causing 2 critical hits.
  • A 6% chance of damage also causing 3 critical hits.
Odds of a specific item being hit Edit

Assuming a critical is going to be dealt to a section, the odds of a particular item being hit depends on how many critical spaces it occupies and how many other spaces are also being occupied.

For example, there are 12 critical spaces in a side torso. Placing an LB 10-X AC (which occupies 6 critical spaces) with six single heat sinks (each occupies 1 critical space) will fill that section with equipment. The odds of the Autocannon taking the hit is 50% since it occupies half the total occupied critical spaces. If the section house the Autocannon and only three single heat sinks, there would be a 66% chance for the Autocannon to take the critical hit since it occupies 6/9 of the total occupied spaces.

Weapons can deal critical damage up to three times. Which equipment takes the critical hit is randomly determined per each critical based on their size and number of occupied critical spaces.

Crit Buffing Edit

Adding expendable items to a section that is occupied by a more important item is an effective way of decreasing the odds of the important item taking a critical hit. Popular choices for crit buffing are Heat Sinks and Gauss Rifle ammo (the only ammo that does not explode). Critical spaces occupied by Endo-Steel Structure and Ferro Fibrous Armor do not count towards the number of occupied spaces. Actuators, engines, and gyros also count towards the number of occupied spaces but none of them can be destroyed by critical hits. That might change in the future though.

Calculating the Damage Edit

Most weapons will deal the same amount of damage they do to the internal structure as they do for each critical hit. For example, if an Autocannon 10 hit internal structure and achieves 2 critical hits, it will deal two separate critical hits of 10 points to internal equipment.

The exception are the critical seeking weapons like the Machine Guns, Flamers, and LB X Autocannons.

  • Flamers will deal 110% damage (0.77 damage) to internal components
  • Machine Guns will deal 1,350% damage (1.08 damage) per bullet
  • LB X Autocannons will deal 200% damage (2 damage) per pellet
Ammunition/Gauss Rifle Explosions Edit

Most areas are vulnerable to taking critical damage.

When an ammunition bin is destroyed by a critical hit, it has a 10% chance of detonating its remaining ammunition as an internal explosion. When a Gauss Rifle is destroyed, it has a 90% chance of exploding, and dealing 20pts of damage to the section it's housed in. When a section housing either ammunition or a Gauss Rifle is destroyed, each ammunition bin and rifle has a 10 or 90% chance of exploding respectively. [1]

With the above info in mind, one must be careful where they place ammo in their 'Mech. An unlucky ammo explosion in a leg could spell doom for a light chassis. On the flip side, an ammo explosion in the side torso might travel to the center torso, and destroy the engine. The Gauss Rifle is a particularly hazardous weapon to field, due to its low health (5pts), its high chance of explosion on destruction (90%), and its large size (7 critical spaces). These risks can be mitigated with a CASE.

Guide Edit

Read Crits And You - A Brief Guide for addition information and suggestions on critical damage.

References Edit

Ruger 10

Ruger 10/22 Magnum Rifle Review

Updated February 17, 2016.

This article was originally published in Shooting Times magazine in April, 1999.

The classic 10/22 semiauto rimfire rifle takes a major step with the introduction of a brand-new 22 WMR version, and according to our Technical Editor, it's a real gem.

rom almost the moment of its introduction in 1964, fans of the Ruger Model 10/22 Carbine 22 Long Rifle semiauto rifle have clamored for a 22 WMR rimfire magnum version.

Continue Reading Below

Now they have one: the new Ruger Standard 10/22 Magnum, and it's a gem.

The 10/22 rifle is one of the most successful recreational shooting sports products in history. A sure sign any firearm design has reached "classic" status is when the world fills up with accessories and imitations from other manufacturers, and the ongoing "10/22 Craze" is fair proof that Bill Ruger's 22 LR semiauto has long since reached that level. The present shooting sports marketplace is simply packed with variations on the 10/22 theme, including a huge list of different wood, laminated, and synthetic aftermarket stock designs, plus magazines, barrels, sights, and other accessories, along with "total custom rifle" packages from some of the nation's best-known and highly regarded gunsmiths and manufacturing firms like Jim Clark, Briley, MRI, Turner Custom, Choat, Ram-Line, and Hogue to name just a few.

From backyard soda-can plinking to the Champion's Circle at the NSSF Sportsmen's Team Challenge, the Ruger 10/22 is everywhere. My son is the third generation in my family to have one.

The popular 22 Long Rifle versions of the Ruger-manufactured gun are so well and widely known that little description is necessary. The basic design employs Ruger's trademark integrated modular subassembly design features throughout. The trigger housing contains the entire firing mechanism, which features a short-throw, high-speed swinging hammer for rapid locktime.

Continue Reading Below

The one-piece 22 LR receiver is milled from a solid block of cast aluminum and is drilled and tapped for a tip-off scope mount adaptor supplied with the gun. The barrel-mounted open sights feature a fold-down adjustable rear leaf and gold bead front blade. The safety is a sliding crossbolt in the front of the trigger guard. A manual latch just in front of the trigger guard can be used to manually lock open the bolt. The magazine is the compact rotary 10-shot unit introduced 35 years ago with the original 10/22, which has since become basic to many other rimfire and centerfire Ruger rifles as well.

The 1999 Ruger catalog contains 10 different 10/22 model variations, including the new 10/22 Magnum. The 22 LR versions include the Standard configuration in blue or stainless with barrel band and one-piece smooth hardwood stock; the All-Weather models in blue or stainless with barrel band and black synthetic stock; the International Carbine models in blue or stainless with full-length Mannlicher-type checkered hardwood stock; the Deluxe Sporter version in blue only with checkered walnut stock (no barrel band); and the Target Models with hammer-forged, spiral-finish bull barrels in blue or stainless plus laminated, target-style uncheckered stocks (Target Models do not have open sights). All except the 20-inch Target Models feature 18 1/2-inch barrels. Add in the new 22 WMR Standard model and you have a 10/22 for just about any 22 rimfire use imaginable.

The New Magnum 10/22

With so many different-appearance 10/22s already available, Ruger is taking some pains to point out that the new 22 WMR rimfire magnum product represents the most extensive modifications to the Ruger 10/22 series since its introduction in 1964. The company's goal was to add the more powerful 22 WMR chambering without changing the external appearance, dimensions, or handling qualities of the 10/22 format in any way. This turned out to be very tricky, which may come as something of a surprise to the casual observer who thinks the 22 WMR and 22 LR cartridges are really not all that different in terms of operating energy. And it's true that when compared as a pair across the order-of-magnitude gap between them and any centerfire rifle cartridge, the two rimfires may indeed appear similar. But in terms of their internal ballistic characteristics relative to autoloader applications, they have quite different requirements.

The basic Ruger 10/22 autoloader mechanism is a straight blowback design (as are nearly all 22 LR autoloading firearms, rifle or pistol). In straight blowback mechanisms, when the cartridge ignites, propellant gas pressure first pushes the cartridge case back against the boltface as the bullet is propelled down the bore. The weight/inertia balance of the bolt must be just enough to slow the rearward movement of the case until the chamber pressure drops to a safe level before opening while still allowing sufficient "give" so that the cartridge case can be safely extracted and ejected while the bolt continues to move to the rear, compressing the mainspring/recoil spring, which will in turn power it back towards its rest position against the chamber, chambering a cartridge from the magazine in the process.

Blowback systems are often called "simple," but a properly designed blowback system is actually a very finely tuned balance of interior ballistic functions, requiring a precise matching of bolt weight, spring strength, and cartridge pressure. The more powerful the cartridge, the heavier and more massive the bolt must be and the stiffer the recoil spring/s. You could design a direct-blowback belted magnum rifle, but its weight and dimensions would be impractical for sport or field use, which is why most centerfire autoloaders-long guns and handguns alike-use other types of autoloader mechanisms.

Given its higher chamber pressure and consequently greater rearward bolt thrust, a blowback-operated mechanism for the 22 WMR magnum cartridge requires a bolt weighing at least twice as much as a blowback bolt for a 22 Long Rifle autoloader (other factors, like spring strength, enter in, but that's essentially the difference). So the engineering challenge facing Ruger's designers was to design a heavier bolt into the basic 10/22 blowback action without spoiling the lightweight, compact qualities that helped make the rifle such a major success in the first place. Lengthening the bolt and receiver was simply unacceptable.

The finished product clearly shows the challenge was met, as the external dimensions and appearance of the new Ruger 10/22 Magnum rifle are virtually identical to the standard 22 LR Ruger 10/22 carbine. Although the overall weight is somewhat greater, its balance and handling qualities remain essentially unchanged.

The key to the accomplishment was very recent developments in fabrication materials technology. During the last few years, a whole new group of engineering materials called heavy metal alloys (HMA) have become available for commercially viable manufacturing use (pioneered in significant part by Ruger's advanced metals foundries). HMA components are created by heat-fusing a metal-alloy powder into barstock or specially formed blanks. These alloy components have the functional strength of steel but weigh more than twice as much as steel for the same volume. Using HMA technology, Ruger was therefore able to design a compact heavy bolt allowing a blowback-operated 22 Magnum rimfire to function inside a compact, streamlined 22 LR-dimension receiver. In addition to preserving the classic 10/22 configuration and handling, this also enabled Ruger to use most of the same time-proven 10/22 components and parts. But not all.

Ruger 10/22 Magnum
22 WMR Semiauto Rifle

Manufacturer. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc.
200 Ruger Rd.
Prescott, AZ 86301
Model. 10/22 Magnum
Operation. Direct blowback
Caliber. 22 WMR
Barrel length. 18.5 inches
Overall length. 37.25 inches
Stock. One-piece American hardwood
Length of pull. 13.38 inches
Weight, empty. 6.5 pounds
Safety. Sliding crossbutton
Sights. Adjustable folding-leaf rear;
gold bead front blade; receiver
has integral bases for Ruger scope
rings (supplied)
Sight radius. 15 inches
Rifling. 6 grooves; 1:14 RH twist
Magazine capacity. 9 rounds
Finish. Blue
Price. $425

Propelled by the greater magnum rimfire pressure, the heavier 22 WMR bolt strikes the limiting crosspin at the rear of the receiver with significantly greater force than with 22 LR versions, so the Ruger 10/22 Magnum also has a heat-treated steel receiver instead of the standard 22 LR Ruger 10/22 aluminum-alloy receiver. Plus, this steel magnum receiver is precision machined to incorporate Ruger's patented integral scope mounting system, and each 10/22 Magnum comes standard with a set of Ruger scope rings.

The remainder of the new magnum autoloader is classic 10/22. The barrel is of blued ordnance-quality steel, with the familiar gold bead front sight and a single folding leaf rear sight (slide/screw adjustable for elevation and drift adjustable for windage). The sliding cross-button-type safety is conveniently located in the front of the trigger guard where it is accessible for either right- or left-hand shooters. The initial 10/22 Standard version format for the magnum model utilizes Ruger's carbine-style American hardwood stock with barrel band. The rotary magazine is the same as used in Ruger's bolt-action model 77/22 Magnum, with a capacity of nine rounds.

The Shooting Times review sample 10/22 Magnum is a fine example of Ruger workmanship. Fit and finish were tight and smooth, and the one-piece stock had a visible ripple-grain pattern that is rare to see on Standard hardwood. The trigger pull was typical 10/22 in feel, breaking at about 6.25 pounds. If not for the slightly longer magazine and ejection port and the milled ring-base mounts atop the steel receiver, you wouldn't know it from a 22 LR model.

A Versatile Performer

The introduction of this magnum 10/22 comes at a time when the 22 WMR cartridge is enjoying a new surge in popularity. Just a few years ago there were only two ammunition manufacturers-Winchester and CCI-producing 22 Magnum loads, both with just a JHP and a solid-bullet offering. Then Federal weighed in with its own pair of solid and JHP 22 WMR cartridges, followed in 1997 by announcements from Remington and PMC that they also would be entering the 22 Magnum marketplace. The reason is mainly economic. Out to the 100-yard range a premium 22 WMR bullet offers nearly the same performance for varmint and predator hunters as the smaller case 22 centerfires at considerably less cost per round (even when handloading).

As of the end of 1998 there were 10 individual 22 WMR loads available in gunshops. Winchester continues to offer its classic and originating 40-grain Solid and 40-grain JHP loadings plus its new Supreme 34-grain JHP that sports a new high-performance bullet especially designed for this cartridge. CCI has its classic 40-grain Maxi-Mag solid, 36-grain Maxi-Mag HP, plus the recent hyperspeed 30-grain Maxi-Mag +V HP. Federal currently offers four individual 22 WMR loads: the Classic 40-grain FMJ, 30-grain JHP, heavy 50-grain JHP, and the Premium 30-grain Sierra JHP loading. PMC's two announced 22 WMR loads have not yet reached the market, nor have the three 22 WMR loads announced last year by Remington. Shooting Times did receive a limited pre-production quantity of Remington's high-performance 33-grain Polymer-Tip load featuring a special-design Hornady V-Max bullet, so we have been able to include it in this review for a total of 11 loads in all.

I first set up the new rifle with a Tasco 1.5-3X scope for function-firing, a scope with this magnification being a fine choice for relatively close rapid-fire work such as scurrying rats near a corn crib or a woodchuck scrambling for den's door. I ran 100 rounds each of the 10 current on-the-market loads through the gun with an informal zero for plinking targets, just to get its feel and see how it digested the different ammo types right from the box. And there was a difference. All loads in the 36- to 40-grain weights ran without a hitch from the outset. But with both the lighter bullet and heavier bullet loads, there was a perceptible difference to the feel of the action when cycling, and during the first few magazines I fired with the Federal 30-grain Sierra loads and the Federal 50-grain loading I had an occasional failure for the fired case to clear the ejection port. The following round had been picked up and chambered, but the empty case was jamming the bolt open. Clearly, the extreme bullet weights were right on the bubble in terms of the balance of blowback forces and were not sending the bolt quite far enough backward. I'd already fired about 500 other rounds, so I disassembled the gun according to the Ruger manual's instructions for maintenance, thoroughly cleaned it, lubed the bolt channel with Teflon-based Outers Tri-Lube, and resumed firing. There were no more stoppages with any loads. The lesson here is clear. Blowback actions are precisely balanced. If you use varied loads that produce different case-thrust profiles against the bolt, you test the extremes of that balance. The sample Ruger 10/22 Magnum worked perfectly with all current 22 WMR ammunition loads after I initially cleaned it. And after several hundred more wear-in firings, it was not so sensitive as when brand new. By the time I had proceeded on and completed my full accuracy review, I had put over 2000 rounds total through the rifle without further maintenance. The last thing I did before racking it was run a 50-round box each of the Federal 30- and 50-grain rounds rapid-fire down the bore. Zero problems.

For the accuracy testing I set the gun up with a Simmons 3.8-12X44mm AETEC scope for a precision sight picture and fired five 10-round groups (full magazine plus chamber) at both a 50-yard and a 100-yard target with all 11 loads listed in the chart. The results were exceptional. I frankly did not expect the autoloading rifle to be as accurate as it proved-more accurate, in fact, than my Ruger bolt-action 77/22 Magnum with the same ammunition. The overall average for all groups fired was barely over two inches at 100 yards and less than one inch at 50 yards. This gun is a gem!

The day after I finished the range review I was leaving for a winter cougar hunt in the Utah high country where I knew I'd also have the chance to do some coyote calling, so I packed the new 10/22 Magnum and some Winchester Supreme 33-grain ammo in my kit. The 3.8-12X Simmons scope is perfect for such work, as a successful call can sometimes bring a coyote right into your lap or leave him standing curious 100 yards away. With the rapid-fire accuracy of the 10/22 Magnum and the high-performance bullet of the Winchester Supreme 33-grain JHP, I had a perfect tool.

Shooting Ruger's 10/22 Magnum