Essay for you

Pro Factory Farming Essay

Category: Essay

Description

FREE Factory Farming Essay

Topics in this paper Popular Topics

It is in the human nature to eat meat and poultry. Eating meat and birds is a part of millions of people's everyday diet. Eating meat had a lot of advantages to your body. It provides the body with protein and iron. It is almost impossible to find a restaurant that does not serve meat and poultry. Raising livestock is a job that many people decide to join. Raising animals to be consumed can be a very lucrative job. There is a major demand for meat in grocery markets. But this supply comes with a hefty price - cruel treatment of innocent animals. Seventeen to seventy million "farm  animals are killed every year for human consumption. The joy of eating meat comes at the price of an animal's life. The facts will paint a picture of exactly how gruesome factory farming can be.

People who eat animals are unaware of the pain and suffering that animals have to endure before they are killed. Dairy cows are forced to live in a metal cage just two feet wide. The cows are denied straw bedding and forced to sleep on concrete flooring. In order for a cow to produce milk, a cow must be pregnant of nursing a calf, so dairy cows are forced to have a calf every year. "A diary cow gives milk seven out of the nine months they are pregnant  ( "Factory Milk Production  N.Pag.). In nature, a cow would give ten gallons of milk but with genetic manipulation and intensive production technologies dairy cows give over a hundred gallons of milk per day. Due to this fact, over half the diary cows have brittle bones and "milk fever . Milk fever is caused by calcium deficiency. A dairy cows body cannot produce enough calcium it needs in its body. When a dairy cow's calf is born it has a fifty-fifty chance of become a dairy cow or veal and ground beef. As soon as a calf is born, it is taken away from it's mother. The females are raised in confinement until they are at a "milk giving  age. Over half the males that are born become veal. "Veal is a by-pro

Essays Related to Factory Farming

Other articles

Реферат - An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research - Иностранный язык

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay, Research Paper

The world becomes a sad place when we allow animals to be factory-farmed, treating

them inhumanely to be used for our pleasure. Yes, hogs are mentally inferior to humans

but that gives us no right to force these horrible conditions on them. God made humans to

have dominion over animals, with the proof in Genesis 1:26. Therefore, it is my opinion

that we are supposed to protect animals in the same manner as we would protect a small

child. Rush Limbaugh makes the argument that factory farming is acceptable because it is

positive for economic growth. However, as in various cases greed is the source of many

evils. The idea of ?bigger and better things? and the extra dollar ultimately molds

society?s morals. People like Limbaugh who advocate factory farming for economic

growth and, at the same time, argue that cruelty to animals is wrong are showing

inconsistencies in their reasoning. It is hard to be on both sides of the spectrum. One

cannot be liberal and conservative or pro-choice and pro-life, so how is it possible that one

can advocate the cruelty to animals while at the same time disapproving it? The value of a

dollar is shown in the morals of these people — that it is justifiable to do wrong as long as

it pays well. The priorities of such people are in the wrong order. Economic growth is not

a reason for us to abuse these animals, we must respect them, just as we, ideally, must

respect all of God?s creatures.

Limbaugh also argues that animals have no language or intelligence. It is true that

we cannot communicate to hogs through the means by which we communicate to other

humans however, they are able to relay certain messages to other hogs, which shows a

type of language. Some animal rights activists believe that just because animals do not

have the same language as people that they have none. It is apparent that many people

believe that because animals cannot communicate with humans they have no language at

all, perhaps it is that we do not and will not take the time to become aware of their

languages. The same can be said about the hogs? intelligence. In the video. We are all

Noah. there are apparent behavioral differences between the hogs in a healthy

environment and those which are held in the confines of factory farming. There is little

room for physical and mental growth. There is a type of arrogance and ignorance shown

on our part. We are blind to the ingenuity of animals, labeling them, as does Limbaugh, as

having no intelligence. It has become a cultural norm for us to be apathetic to factory

farming. I am also guilty of being swayed by this norm — I like pork just as much as the

next person. I actually was not aware of the conditions of factory farming until I did some

research. And now I ask: why didn?t I know? I think it is because we have been

conditioned to demean the worth of hogs so we can use them for our benefit. Society, as

a whole, is not aware of much beyond what is on their plate. Factory farmers do not

make their practices known. Instead it is animal rights activists who discover the

conditions and expose them to the public, allowing us to make our own decisions

concerning the issue.

In my opinion, factory farming is the result of a chain. Consumers obviously want

low prices on the products that they buy; retailers must supply what the customer wants

in order to stay in business therefore demanding more products; manufacturers and

farmers must be able to produce more products to satisfy the retailers. Humane farming is

too slow to meet the demands needed and thus, there is factory farming. However, this is

expensive. Farmers, in order to keep their own costs down and their profits up, create the

horrible conditions in which these hogs are kept.

2. Once again the lust for luxury drives society. The American Dream is now defined

by what you have and its price. This recent, highly materialistic definition is undermining

the importance of family, religion, community, and the natural world. And as the morals

of this country are shadowed by a monetary giant, our economy is booming. Is there any

possible solution that would keep our current economic system in good shape while

leaving consumers with the right priorities? Ideally, yes; however this greed is fed by the

media and its want for profit. In the consumer economic model, there is the idea that

portrays that the fabric of culture should reflect what is presented in the constant

advertisements that surround us — the importance of buying. We, as a society, have been

misguided by advertisers and it might be too hard for us to change. The impact of the

media is very large and very affective, focusing on our desire to have more than our

neighbors. We are constantly fed with the idea that materials make a better life. This

leaves our judgments about spending clouded with misconception about responsible

consumption. In order for us to consume responsibly, we must first be aware of the

problem. According to the Economic Consumer model, happiness is the result of

satisfying the want for material goods. Paul Krugman disagrees with this point in his

article arguing that ?you can?t really buy happiness, certainly not for society as a whole.

The problem is that happiness cannot be sold in a store and yet so many ads try to portray

this, causing society to view luxuries as necessities. It becomes a cycle as we constantly

try to prove our worth to the community by buying the newest and most updated items,

promoted by never-ending advertising. We then see others who have better items and we

must outdo them. Thus, we compete by purchasing more and more often spending more

than our income. How can we measure the worth of our happiness by material

possessions, which are, in themselves, transitory? The logic of this is obviously expressed

in the media and has extremely large influences on us as a society.

It must become our objective, as consumers, to understand the problems of the

current economic system. We must confront the materialistic permutation of the

American Dream and propose positive alternatives. Consumers must recognize the

correlation between their choices and the survival of the planet. Governments must

establish incentives for corporations and individuals to do what is right. Privately owned

manufacturers and farmers must alter the way their products are produced, the amount of

chemicals that are used and the kinds of testing that is done. Although these are all

necessary in helping our economy move towards the right direction, the solution begins in

the home. Parents must teach their children the fascination of imagination, satisfaction of

service and the importance of stewardship to nature. These things are absent in the family

of David and Nancy, presented in ?Rigor and Responsibility. Through this example, it

becomes apparent that many people justify greed, and let us call it what it is, with excuses

of bringing the family together or a chance for relaxation. Families must learn that

materials and wealth do not equal happiness. When we do this, we will be able to examine

our values, set our priorities and slowly begin to have an economic system that is

beneficial to our prosperity and soothing to our consciences.

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay, Research Paper

The world becomes a sad place when we allow animals to be factory-farmed, treating

them inhumanely to be used for our pleasure. Yes, hogs are mentally inferior to humans

but that gives us no right to force these horrible conditions on them. God made humans to

have dominion over animals, with the proof in Genesis 1:26. Therefore, it is my opinion

that we are supposed to protect animals in the same manner as we would protect a small

child. Rush Limbaugh makes the argument that factory farming is acceptable because it is

positive for economic growth. However, as in various cases greed is the source of many

evils. The idea of ?bigger and better things? and the extra dollar ultimately molds

society?s morals. People like Limbaugh who advocate factory farming for economic

growth and, at the same time, argue that cruelty to animals is wrong are showing

inconsistencies in their reasoning. It is hard to be on both sides of the spectrum. One

cannot be liberal and conservative or pro-choice and pro-life, so how is it possible that one

can advocate the cruelty to animals while at the same time disapproving it? The value of a

dollar is shown in the morals of these people — that it is justifiable to do wrong as long as

it pays well. The priorities of such people are in the wrong order. Economic growth is not

a reason for us to abuse these animals, we must respect them, just as we, ideally, must

respect all of God?s creatures.

Limbaugh also argues that animals have no language or intelligence. It is true that

we cannot communicate to hogs through the means by which we communicate to other

humans however, they are able to relay certain messages to other hogs, which shows a

type of language. Some animal rights activists believe that just because animals do not

have the same language as people that they have none. It is apparent that many people

believe that because animals cannot communicate with humans they have no language at

all, perhaps it is that we do not and will not take the time to become aware of their

languages. The same can be said about the hogs? intelligence. In the video. We are all

Noah. there are apparent behavioral differences between the hogs in a healthy

environment and those which are held in the confines of factory farming. There is little

room for physical and mental growth. There is a type of arrogance and ignorance shown

on our part. We are blind to the ingenuity of animals, labeling them, as does Limbaugh, as

having no intelligence. It has become a cultural norm for us to be apathetic to factory

farming. I am also guilty of being swayed by this norm — I like pork just as much as the

next person. I actually was not aware of the conditions of factory farming until I did some

research. And now I ask: why didn?t I know? I think it is because we have been

conditioned to demean the worth of hogs so we can use them for our benefit. Society, as

a whole, is not aware of much beyond what is on their plate. Factory farmers do not

make their practices known. Instead it is animal rights activists who discover the

conditions and expose them to the public, allowing us to make our own decisions

concerning the issue.

In my opinion, factory farming is the result of a chain. Consumers obviously want

low prices on the products that they buy; retailers must supply what the customer wants

in order to stay in business therefore demanding more products; manufacturers and

farmers must be able to produce more products to satisfy the retailers. Humane farming is

too slow to meet the demands needed and thus, there is factory farming. However, thi

expensive. Farmers, in order to keep their own costs down and their profits up, create the

horrible conditions in which these hogs are kept.

2. Once again the lust for luxury drives society. The American Dream is now defined

by what you have and its price. This recent, highly materialistic definition is undermining

the importance of family, religion, community, and the natural world. And as the morals

of this country are shadowed by a monetary giant, our economy is booming. Is there any

possible solution that would keep our current economic system in good shape while

leaving consumers with the right priorities? Ideally, yes; however this greed is fed by the

media and its want for profit. In the consumer economic model, there is the idea that

portrays that the fabric of culture should reflect what is presented in the constant

advertisements that surround us — the importance of buying. We, as a society, have been

misguided by advertisers and it might be too hard for us to change. The impact of the

media is very large and very affective, focusing on our desire to have more than our

neighbors. We are constantly fed with the idea that materials make a better life. This

leaves our judgments about spending clouded with misconception about responsible

consumption. In order for us to consume responsibly, we must first be aware of the

problem. According to the Economic Consumer model, happiness is the result of

satisfying the want for material goods. Paul Krugman disagrees with this point in his

article arguing that ?you can?t really buy happiness, certainly not for society as a whole.

The problem is that happiness cannot be sold in a store and yet so many ads try to portray

this, causing society to view luxuries as necessities. It becomes a cycle as we constantly

try to prove our worth to the community by buying the newest and most updated items,

promoted by never-ending advertising. We then see others who have better items and we

must outdo them. Thus, we compete by purchasing more and more often spending more

than our income. How can we measure the worth of our happiness by material

possessions, which are, in themselves, transitory? The logic of this is obviously expressed

in the media and has extremely large influences on us as a society.

It must become our objective, as consumers, to understand the problems of the

current economic system. We must confront the materialistic permutation of the

American Dream and propose positive alternatives. Consumers must recognize the

correlation between their choices and the survival of the planet. Governments must

establish incentives for corporations and individuals to do what is right. Privately owned

manufacturers and farmers must alter the way their products are produced, the amount of

chemicals that are used and the kinds of testing that is done. Although these are all

necessary in helping our economy move towards the right direction, the solution begins in

the home. Parents must teach their children the fascination of imagination, satisfaction of

service and the importance of stewardship to nature. These things are absent in the family

of David and Nancy, presented in ?Rigor and Responsibility. Through this example, it

becomes apparent that many people justify greed, and let us call it what it is, with excuses

of bringing the family together or a chance for relaxation. Families must learn that

materials and wealth do not equal happiness. When we do this, we will be able to examine

our values, set our priorities and slowly begin to have an economic system that is

beneficial to our prosperity and soothing to our consciences.

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay, Research Paper

The world becomes a sad place when we allow animals to be factory-farmed, treating

them inhumanely to be used for our pleasure. Yes, hogs are mentally inferior to humans

but that gives us no right to force these horrible conditions on them. God made humans to

have dominion over animals, with the proof in Genesis 1:26. Therefore, it is my opinion

that we are supposed to protect animals in the same manner as we would protect a small

child. Rush Limbaugh makes the argument that factory farming is acceptable because it is

positive for economic growth. However, as in various cases greed is the source of many

evils. The idea of ?bigger and better things? and the extra dollar ultimately molds

society?s morals. People like Limbaugh who advocate factory farming for economic

growth and, at the same time, argue that cruelty to animals is wrong are showing

inconsistencies in their reasoning. It is hard to be on both sides of the spectrum. One

cannot be liberal and conservative or pro-choice and pro-life, so how is it possible that one

can advocate the cruelty to animals while at the same time disapproving it? The value of a

dollar is shown in the morals of these people — that it is justifiable to do wrong as long as

it pays well. The priorities of such people are in the wrong order. Economic growth is not

a reason for us to abuse these animals, we must respect them, just as we, ideally, must

respect all of God?s creatures.

Limbaugh also argues that animals have no language or intelligence. It is true that

we cannot communicate to hogs through the means by which we communicate to other

humans however, they are able to relay certain messages to other hogs, which shows a

type of language. Some animal rights activists believe that just because animals do not

have the same language as people that they have none. It is apparent that many people

believe that because animals cannot communicate with humans they have no language at

all, perhaps it is that we do not and will not take the time to become aware of their

languages. The same can be said about the hogs? intelligence. In the video. We are all

Noah. there are apparent behavioral differences between the hogs in a healthy

environment and those which are held in the confines of factory farming. There is little

room for physical and mental growth. There is a type of arrogance and ignorance shown

on our part. We are blind to the ingenuity of animals, labeling them, as does Limbaugh, as

having no intelligence. It has become a cultural norm for us to be apathetic to factory

farming. I am also guilty of being swayed by this norm — I like pork just as much as the

next person. I actually was not aware of the conditions of factory farming until I did some

research. And now I ask: why didn?t I know? I think it is because we have been

conditioned to demean the worth of hogs so we can use them for our benefit. Society, as

a whole, is not aware of much beyond what is on their plate. Factory farmers do not

make their practices known. Instead it is animal rights activists who discover the

conditions and expose them to the public, allowing us to make our own decisions

concerning the issue.

In my opinion, factory farming is the result of a chain. Consumers obviously want

low prices on the products that they buy; retailers must supply what the customer wants

in order to stay in business therefore demanding more products; manufacturers and

farmers must be able to produce more products to satisfy the retailers. Humane farming is

too slow to meet the demands needed and thus, there is factory farming. However, this is

expensive. Farmers, in order to keep their own costs down and their profits up, create the

horrible conditions in which these hogs are kept.

2. Once again the lust for luxury drives society. The American Dream is now defined

by what you have and its price. This recent, highly materialistic definition is undermining

the importance of family, religion, community, and the natural world. And as the morals

of this country are shadowed by a monetary giant, our economy is booming. Is there any

possible solution that would keep our current economic system in good shape while

leaving consumers with the right priorities? Ideally, yes; however this greed is fed by the

media and its want for profit. In the consumer economic model, there is the idea that

portrays that the fabric of culture should reflect what is presented in the constant

advertisements that surround us — the importance of buying. We, as a society, have been

misguided by advertisers and it might be too hard for us to change. The impact of the

media is very large and very affective, focusing on our desire to have more than our

neighbors. We are constantly fed with the idea that materials make a better life. This

leaves our judgments about spending clouded with misconception about responsible

consumption. In order for us to consume responsibly, we must first be aware of the

problem. According to the Economic Consumer model, happiness is the result of

satisfying the want for material goods. Paul Krugman disagrees with this point in his

article arguing that ?you can?t really buy happiness, certainly not for society as a whole.

The problem is that happiness cannot be sold in a store and yet so many ads try to portray

this, causing society to view luxuries as necessities. It becomes a cycle as we constantly

try to prove our worth to the community by buying the newest and most updated items,

promoted by never-ending advertising. We then see others who have better items and we

must outdo them. Thus, we compete by purchasing more and more often spending more

than our income. How can we measure the worth of our happiness by material

possessions, which are, in themselves, transitory? The logic of this is obviously expressed

in the media and has extremely large influences on us as a society.

It must become our objective, as consumers, to understand the problems of the

current economic system. We must confront the materialistic permutation of the

American Dream and propose positive alternatives. Consumers must recognize the

correlation between their choices and the survival of the planet. Governments must

establish incentives for corporations and individuals to do what is right. Privately owned

manufacturers and farmers must alter the way their products are produced, the amount of

chemicals that are used and the kinds of testing that is done. Although these are all

necessary in helping our economy move towards the right direction, the solution begins in

the home. Parents must teach their children the fascination of imagination, satisfaction of

service and the importance of stewardship to nature. These things are absent in the family

of David and Nancy, presented in ?Rigor and Responsibility. Through this example, it

becomes apparent that many people justify greed, and let us call it what it is, with excuses

of bringing the family together or a chance for relaxation. Families must learn that

materials and wealth do not equal happiness. When we do this, we will be able to examine

our values, set our priorities and slowly begin to have an economic system that is

beneficial to our prosperity and soothing to our consciences.

Factory Farming - Essay by Pc1476Ln

Factory Farming Essay

Below is an essay on "Factory Farming" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.

In this unit I researched about factory farming and learned lots of things. The factory farming is a way of producing meats in factories. In short, the mass production of crops and livestock that is aimed at providing food at lower costs to consumers. They usually rear pigs, cows and chickens to produce meat and eggs. Most of the animals in the factories do not see sun lights at all, and some of them have diseases. Therefore farming in a factory is controversial topic around the world. In spite of this argument, I think factory farming is not a bad idea of producing meats and eggs.

There are some positive parts of this factory farming. Lot of people has that the factory faming spread diseases to other animals and it is unhealthy. Nonetheless, modern farming stops bad diseases by making the animals healthy. Furthermore, they use clean pesticides, antibiotics, vitamins and fertilizers to produce more and better quality animals. Therefore, costumers could buy meat into lower prices on supermarkets. In addition, promoters of factory farming say that the factory farming helps the economy of a country, creates more jobs, and lower borne illness. In the other hand, there are some negatives of factory farming. Some factories are being cruel to the animals, causing massive pollutions, chemicals like pesticides, destroying communities, causing antibiotic resistance germs, and overcrowded animals in a factory. For these reasons Factory farming is a highly controversial topic between animal rights advocates, environmentalists, farmers and corporations.

Considering all these arguments, I think the factory farming should be allowed to produce meats and eggs. The reasons are, we can get meats in cheaper prizes, the animals are healthier to eat, and factory farms do not harm environment a lot. First of all, we can get meats in cheaper prizes when we buy them in a factory. The meats were produced more in factories than organic farms so that the prizes go.

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay, Research Paper The world becomes a sad place when we allow animals to be factory-farmed, treating them inhumanely to be used for our pleasure. Yes, hogs are mentally inferior to humans but that gives us no right to force these horrible conditions on them. God made humans to have dominion over animals, with the proof in Genesis 1:26. Therefore, it is my opinion that we are supposed to protect animals in the same manner as we would protect a small child. Rush Limbaugh makes the argument that factory farming is acceptable because it is positive for economic growth. However, as in various cases greed is the source of many evils. The idea of ?bigger and better things? and the extra dollar ultimately molds society?s morals. People like

Limbaugh who advocate factory farming for economic growth and, at the same time, argue that cruelty to animals is wrong are showing inconsistencies in their reasoning. It is hard to be on both sides of the spectrum. One cannot be liberal and conservative or pro-choice and pro-life, so how is it possible that one can advocate the cruelty to animals while at the same time disapproving it? The value of a dollar is shown in the morals of these people — that it is justifiable to do wrong as long as it pays well. The priorities of such people are in the wrong order. Economic growth is not a reason for us to abuse these animals, we must respect them, just as we, ideally, must respect all of God?s creatures. Limbaugh also argues that animals have no language or intelligence. It is true

that we cannot communicate to hogs through the means by which we communicate to other humans however, they are able to relay certain messages to other hogs, which shows a type of language. Some animal rights activists believe that just because animals do not have the same language as people that they have none. It is apparent that many people believe that because animals cannot communicate with humans they have no language at all, perhaps it is that we do not and will not take the time to become aware of their languages. The same can be said about the hogs? intelligence. In the video. We are all Noah. there are apparent behavioral differences between the hogs in a healthy environment and those which are held in the confines of factory farming. There is little room for physical

and mental growth. There is a type of arrogance and ignorance shown on our part. We are blind to the ingenuity of animals, labeling them, as does Limbaugh, as having no intelligence. It has become a cultural norm for us to be apathetic to factory farming. I am also guilty of being swayed by this norm — I like pork just as much as the next person. I actually was not aware of the conditions of factory farming until I did some research. And now I ask: why didn?t I know? I think it is because we have been conditioned to demean the worth of hogs so we can use them for our benefit. Society, as a whole, is not aware of much beyond what is on their plate. Factory farmers do not make their practices known. Instead it is animal rights activists who discover the conditions and expose them

to the public, allowing us to make our own decisions concerning the issue. In my opinion, factory farming is the result of a chain. Consumers obviously want low prices on the products that they buy; retailers must supply what the customer wants in order to stay in business therefore demanding more products; manufacturers and farmers must be able to produce more products to satisfy the retailers. Humane farming is too slow to meet the demands needed and thus, there is factory farming. However, this is expensive. Farmers, in order to keep their own costs down and their profits up, create the horrible conditions in which these hogs are kept. 2. Once again the lust for luxury drives society. The American Dream is now defined by what you have and its price. This recent, highly

Реферат на тему An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay Research

An Argument Against Factory Farming Essay, Research Paper

The world becomes a sad place when we allow animals to be factory-farmed, treating

them inhumanely to be used for our pleasure. Yes, hogs are mentally inferior to humans

but that gives us no right to force these horrible conditions on them. God made humans to

have dominion over animals, with the proof in Genesis 1:26. Therefore, it is my opinion

that we are supposed to protect animals in the same manner as we would protect a small

child. Rush Limbaugh makes the argument that factory farming is acceptable because it is

positive for economic growth. However, as in various cases greed is the source of many

evils. The idea of ?bigger and better things? and the extra dollar ultimately molds

society?s morals. People like Limbaugh who advocate factory farming for economic

growth and, at the same time, argue that cruelty to animals is wrong are showing

inconsistencies in their reasoning. It is hard to be on both sides of the spectrum. One

cannot be liberal and conservative or pro-choice and pro-life, so how is it possible that one

can advocate the cruelty to animals while at the same time disapproving it? The value of a

dollar is shown in the morals of these people — that it is justifiable to do wrong as long as

it pays well. The priorities of such people are in the wrong order. Economic growth is not

a reason for us to abuse these animals, we must respect them, just as we, ideally, must

respect all of God?s creatures.

Limbaugh also argues that animals have no language or intelligence. It is true that

we cannot communicate to hogs through the means by which we communicate to other

humans however, they are able to relay certain messages to other hogs, which shows a

type of language. Some animal rights activists believe that just because animals do not

have the same language as people that they have none. It is apparent that many people

believe that because animals cannot communicate with humans they have no language at

all, perhaps it is that we do not and will not take the time to become aware of their

languages. The same can be said about the hogs? intelligence. In the video. We are all

Noah. there are apparent behavioral differences between the hogs in a healthy

environment and those which are held in the confines of factory farming. There is little

room for physical and mental growth. There is a type of arrogance and ignorance shown

on our part. We are blind to the ingenuity of animals, labeling them, as does Limbaugh, as

having no intelligence. It has become a cultural norm for us to be apathetic to factory

farming. I am also guilty of being swayed by this norm — I like pork just as much as the

next person. I actually was not aware of the conditions of factory farming until I did some

research. And now I ask: why didn?t I know? I think it is because we have been

conditioned to demean the worth of hogs so we can use them for our benefit. Society, as

a whole, is not aware of much beyond what is on their plate. Factory farmers do not

make their practices known. Instead it is animal rights activists who discover the

conditions and expose them to the public, allowing us to make our own decisions

concerning the issue.

In my opinion, factory farming is the result of a chain. Consumers obviously want

low prices on the products that they buy; retailers must supply what the customer wants

in order to stay in business therefore demanding more products; manufacturers and

farmers must be able to produce more products to satisfy the retailers. Humane farming is

too slow to meet the demands needed and thus, there is factory farming. However, this is

expensive. Farmers, in order to keep their own costs down and their profits up, create the

horrible conditions in which these hogs are kept.

2. Once again the lust for luxury drives society. The American Dream is now defined

by what you have and its price. This recent, highly materialistic definition is undermining

the importance of family, religion, community, and the natural world. And as the morals

of this country are shadowed by a monetary giant, our economy is booming. Is there any

possible solution that would keep our current economic system in good shape while

leaving consumers with the right priorities? Ideally, yes; however this greed is fed by the

media and its want for profit. In the consumer economic model, there is the idea that

portrays that the fabric of culture should reflect what is presented in the constant

advertisements that surround us — the importance of buying. We, as a society, have been

misguided by advertisers and it might be too hard for us to change. The impact of the

media is very large and very affective, focusing on our desire to have more than our

neighbors. We are constantly fed with the idea that materials make a better life. This

leaves our judgments about spending clouded with misconception about responsible

consumption. In order for us to consume responsibly, we must first be aware of the

problem. According to the Economic Consumer model, happiness is the result of

satisfying the want for material goods. Paul Krugman disagrees with this point in his

article arguing that ?you can?t really buy happiness, certainly not for society as a whole.

The problem is that happiness cannot be sold in a store and yet so many ads try to portray

this, causing society to view luxuries as necessities. It becomes a cycle as we constantly

try to prove our worth to the community by buying the newest and most updated items,

promoted by never-ending advertising. We then see others who have better items and we

must outdo them. Thus, we compete by purchasing more and more often spending more

than our income. How can we measure the worth of our happiness by material

possessions, which are, in themselves, transitory? The logic of this is obviously expressed

in the media and has extremely large influences on us as a society.

It must become our objective, as consumers, to understand the problems of the

current economic system. We must confront the materialistic permutation of the

American Dream and propose positive alternatives. Consumers must recognize the

correlation between their choices and the survival of the planet. Governments must

establish incentives for corporations and individuals to do what is right. Privately owned

manufacturers and farmers must alter the way their products are produced, the amount of

chemicals that are used and the kinds of testing that is done. Although these are all

necessary in helping our economy move towards the right direction, the solution begins in

the home. Parents must teach their children the fascination of imagination, satisfaction of

service and the importance of stewardship to nature. These things are absent in the family

of David and Nancy, presented in ?Rigor and Responsibility. Through this example, it

becomes apparent that many people justify greed, and let us call it what it is, with excuses

of bringing the family together or a chance for relaxation. Families must learn that

materials and wealth do not equal happiness. When we do this, we will be able to examine

our values, set our priorities and slowly begin to have an economic system that is

beneficial to our prosperity and soothing to our consciences.

Should factory farming be banned Essay by

should factory farming be banned?

A Discussion on the Issue of Factory Farming Factory farming generally refers to the industrialized production of livestock. poultry. and fish (Wikipedia. 2007. This sort of farming is also called Confined / Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO 's ) and Intensive Livestock Operations (ILO 's This discussion works on the premise that factory farming is a complex issue precisely because it has its pros and cons. In fact. this issue can be seen in many different perspectives Ethics Economics Health issue Pollution control Food safety Cost to consumers

To be able to explore

these different issues. let us try to answer these questions Question 1 Certain organizations like the Animal Agricultural Alliance think that producers have spent a lot of time and energy on research that would ensure the best care for livestock animals in these "factory farms " They argue that constant veterinary care are made available for these animals. These animals are also provided with state-of-the-art barns that facilitate sanitation and ventilation. Nevertheless. a number of human rights activists still think that these steps taken by producers are not enough to ensure animals rights against cruelty. Instances of such cruelty include the debeaking of chicks after hatching and the confinement of animals to barren environments that lead to physiological and psychological problems (Wikipedia. 2007. What do you think of this issue Question 2 It has been argued that factory farming has contributed in the economy such that a dairy cow contributes US 1300 per year. a beef cow over US 800 (Wikipedia. 2007 ) and so on. 23 jobs are also created every US 1 million increase in milk sales in Pennsylvania (Wikipedia. 2007. But. it has been also argued by groups like Sustainable Table that the health hazards of factory farming has driven public money to subsidize the health costs created by the producers in the first place. Also. jobs are lost as small farmers are forced to stop their businesses as large corporations overtake them. How could we weigh the economic costs of factory farming Question 3 Animal health has been maintained by veterinarians which in turn ensure the health of the consumers. Nevertheless. factory farming techniques also led to the spread of the mad cow disease (Wikipedia. 2007. Are the health risks of farm farming outweighed by its health benefits Question 4 Large factory farms are able to maintain sophisticated sanitary systems (Wikipedia. 2007. Nevertheless. the pollution of air and water is also attributed to these factory farms as millions of gallons of animal wastes may seep in ground water and pollute it (Sustainable Table. What can be done regarding this threat to groundwater (and other foreseeable possible pollution ) that animal wastes may cause Question 5 The smaller number of meat producers should have made "government oversight and regulation " much easier. Nevertheless. the "intensive farming system " of factory farms has made tracking difficult. It is possible that meat sold in the east were produced in the west or. that a hamburger pattie may be produced from the meat of.

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay ( only for $12.99 )

More Papers on factory, farming, farms, England, Wikipedia