Essay for you

Essay On China's Economic Development

Category: Essay


Today s China Economic Development essays - Buy Essay & Research Paper Online Today's China Economic Development

China has an ancient history and was a leading civilization of the
world for many centuries. Today's China (officially the People's Republic
of China) is the most populous country in the world (pop. over 1.3
billion) and the fourth largest in terms of area. The country has undergone
great economic changes in its modern history ranging from its transition to
a radical socialist economy following the Communist Revolution in 1949 to
the market-oriented reforms that stated in the late 1970s and continue till
1. History of Modern China's Economic Development
After decades of political turmoil and civil war between the
nationalists and the communists, the People's Republic of China was founded
in 1949 under the Communist Party of China. Led by Mao Zedong, the newly
established communist state immediately set about restoring the economy,
which had been devastated due to decades of warfare, to a working order.
This was quickly accomplished by repairing the destroyed transportation and
communication links and restoring the economic activity. The banking system
was nationalized and placed under the People's Bank of China. The monetary
system was unified, credit tightened and budgets centralized to control
inflation. Nationwide land reforms were carried out and most of the land
owned by landlords to landless peasants. Farmers were encouraged to co-
operate in some areas of agricultural production leading to the system of
"communes." ("Recovery from War," 1998)
Having established a semblance of normality, the First Five Year Plan
(1953-57) was launched to transform the country's economy on socialist
principles based on the Soviet model. The main objective of the plan was to
achieve a high rate of economic growth through emphasis on industrial
development, particularly the heavy industry. The Soviets helped China's
industrial development by providing technical advice and equipment. The
plan wa.

Related Essays:

Today's China Economic Development. (1969, December 31). In Retrieved 09:35, February 15, 2016, from

MegaEssays. "Today's China Economic Development.", (December 31, 1969). Web. 15 Feb. 2016.

MegaEssays, "Today's China Economic Development.,", (accessed February 15, 2016)

Other articles

China - Economic Development Essay - Research Papers - 1372 Words

China - Economic Development Essay

Kimberly Remijan
Mr. Harvey
The Pros Outweigh the Cons
When one thinks of a major Chinese city such as Shanghai or Beijing, images of sidewalks overcrowded with pedestrians, thousands of bicycles lined on the streets and litter spotted throughout public areas may come to mind. However, with the modernization and industrialization China has gone through, urban citizens are now more frequently using public transport, automobiles are increasingly being used more and people are hired to keep streets as clean as possible. With a little over three decades having past since the major industrial development, China has industrialized at an astonishing rate. This is especially apparent when comparing its much higher industrializing rates to Japan, the UK and the US. With such high rates of growth, there are both negative and positive aspects that come out of such development. Although general health in China is not at its best, post 1980 industrial development has improved the average Chinese citizen’s life tremendously both personally and publically.

Through the rush of industrialization, Chinese industry and production has had a negative effect on the health of citizens because of the air pollution from coal, water pollution from factory emissions and the inhumane working conditions for some people. The production of coal, a major industry in China, emits sulfur compounds, carbon and other byproducts into the air, which increases the risks of cancer, lung and heart issues. “Sulfur dioxide produced in coal combustion poses an immediate threat to the health of China’s citizens, contribution to about 40,000 premature deaths a year” (Bradsher and Barboza). This not only affects the physical welfare of workers but anyone who is exposed to this tainted air. Sulfur dioxide emitted from coal combustion also contributes to acid rain, poisoning bodies of water and vegetation. “Nearly 500 million people lack access to safe drinking water” (Khan and Yardley). With people.

Please sign up to read full document.


Analyse the impact of Globalisation on an economy other than Australia. Chosen Economy- China Globalisation is the growing interdependence of the world’s people and world trade. It involves shrinking space and time and breaking down borders in order to allow people access to new technology, markets, tools and organisations such as the WTO. Globalisation impacts positively on China’s economy by increasing trade and GDP, encouraging foreign investment from Transnational.

1794 Words | 5 Pages

China’s Economic Growth and DevelopmentChina is presently the world’s largest economy in relation to its population of 1.3 billion. The country is currently a socialist economy ruled by a Communist Government, with significant structural changes impacting its economy as a result of the high rate of growth over the past decades. Its economy is in the transition phase, moving from being a centrally planned economy to a system based more on the.

1537 Words | 8 Pages

Discuss the influence of globalisation on the Chinese economy and evaluate the strategies use to promote growth and development . Globalisation is the breakdown of trade barriers between nations to allow for the free flow of goods and services, ideas, communication and information. In the 1980s, China had implemented a series of economic reforms which allowed the country to better integrate with other nations in the region. This was endorsed by the.

1689 Words | 6 Pages

Sustainable Development . from Kyoto to Durban Germany vs. China Professor Frank Peng Chair of Economics Director of World Bank Studies School of Economics and Management Tongji University Shanghai December 16th, 2011 Table of contents Introduction. 1 From Kyoto to Durban.

2919 Words | 9 Pages

ESSAY ON CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE MAIN CATALYSTS TO GROWTH IN CHINA AND INDIA. India with about 1.2 million populations and china with about 1.3 billon population are two big demographic and emerging countries in the world .Over a past few decade India’s combination into the economic has been accompanied by remarkable economic growth (World Bank 2011¬).India is having the 3th position on the economy in purchasing power.

893 Words | 3 Pages

For an economy other than Australia, explain how government development strategies have responded to the process of globalisation. Globalisation refers to the process of increased integration between different countries and economies and the increased impact of international influences on all aspects of life and economic activity. Since 1978, the Chinese “tiger” economy has embarked on a process of social and economic reform designed to improve the.

637 Words | 2 Pages

Controls a country’s money and banking system Set up as a financial business with the desire to make profit and it does not deal with ordinary customers Its primary purpose is the overall management of the financial system in accordance with the economic objectives of the Commonwealth Government Created in 1959 under the Reserve Bank Act 1959 Prior to that, limited central banking operations were conducted by the Commonwealth Bank Functions of RBA Conducting monetary.

708 Words | 3 Pages

dominated by a small number of firms. Oligopoly assumptions: 1- Few firms dominate the industry. 2- Large market share of industry's output is shared by a few firms. 3- Products may be identical or differentiated. 4- High barriers to entry due to economics of scale, high startup costs and, legal barriers. 5-The firms mainly rely on non-price competition Monopolistic competition: Monopolistic competition assumptions: 1- The industry is made of large number of.

630 Words | 4 Pages

China s economic development - Free Economics Essay - Essay UK

Free Economics essays

China's economic development can be seen to have passed through the East Asia model of development but to a certain extent China did not use the East Asia model. This being seen the way that China's reforms of 1970.

Usenov Marat, Comparative Regional Economy

  1. The factor growth of investments, in sector of a manufacturing industry and external competitiveness which has been translated on interventional industrial, trading, financial and other areas;
  2. Competitive economy, it is protected from the foreign companies and during the periods of economic recession, it is expected, that in a condition to protect itself from internal contenders and on the world market;
  3. The macroeconomic policy, it is directed on budgetary balance, or even surpluses, and tries not to admit high rates of inflation;
  4. Favorable preconditions of wider of social and economic and political character, such as homogeneous (and slow growth) the population, high level formation of the human capital, rather equal distribution of incomes (thanks partially before reform in agriculture), competent and fair bureaucracy the authoritative governments on an extent большей parts of the period considered here.

Competitiveness on a foreign market was an economic policy main objective in three countries. Successful development of the countries and deficiency of natural resources, that competitiveness should be reached in manufacturing industry sector.

In all three countries, it "the Choice of winners", and is even better "to make winners" a used arsenal of a measure on stimulation of investments in the country and to raise competitiveness abroad.

Investments into a fixed capital which was high level in three countries, directly it was stimulated with the state. (Especially, on Taiwan and in Korea) which crowds in "the private capital of sector have helped".

In Japan and Korea (though in some degrees and on Taiwan), were rigid restrictions on straight lines foreign investments (ПИИ), the domestic companies directed on protection against absorption.

Competitiveness numerous thin, or not so thin, forms protectionism in relation to foreign manufacturers strongly promoted. Their number concern the simple policy of replacement of import, direct or indirect export grants, preferential a distribution foreign currency, and, at times, the exchange rate is underestimated.

It is obvious at macroeconomic level rates of growth of gross national product were very similar. The same as it is represented, were concerns the general growth of productivity of factors of manufacture, at least to Japan and China interested.

Similarity in success and to leave at external level.

The further similarity, probably, is covered in widespread belief in all four countries that competitive market conditions have crucial importance for fast economic growth.

As well as in JTK, the Chinese government spends the circumspect nalogovo-budgetary policy (the Witness actual absence of a public debt), and have reached modest proficiency of the budget during the period as a whole. Measurement a monetary and credit policy, as well as in JTK, difficultly considering, that interest rates, as a rule, is under the control.

Nevertheless, not all in China work on the lines similar JTK.

The interesting difference arises in the field of distribution of incomes. All four countries,

Partly thanks to early agricultural reforms, have begun their high years of growth at rather equal distribution structures (actually in China, they were very equal on international the standards). It is interesting, that though these models were widely is supported in JTK, they have broken in China. The countries which are declared still about socialist by the status, under presidency for exclusively fast opening of differentiation of incomes probably, even faster, than one, that has occurred in Russia after disintegration of Soviet Union. Now China can be a society which is are less equal, than from the Organization of the Incorporated States. It is, of course, true, that fast growth has lifted the big percent of the population to get out of poverty, and successes also then do not differ have been registered in JTK, without it leads drama rupture opening in levels of the income which was as the proof in China.

Despite the efforts undertaken now to try to soften some more extreme city both agricultural population and regional distinctions in distribution of incomes which have arisen, especially within last decade, it is improbable, that China can reach. Anything similar in incomes, which were (and to some extent till now) it is extended in JTK.

In wide area external

Competitiveness and the industrial policy. Competitiveness had for the Chinese Power the same as it happens with JTK, and indirectly testifies the beginning of creation (in 1979 when the country was still almost автаркии) special economic the Zones devoted to exclusively export production.

China, joint-stock company of industrial planning, apparently, have played much less

Five years' plans were regularly are published (partially in words communistic ideologies), listing to sectors and activity kinds have chosen for advancement, but it, as a matter of fact, to read, how want lists almost all. In 1980, for example, Äúthe the Chinese state tried to prevent too many branches промышлен ости

China, joint-stock company of external competitiveness promoted not so much orientation

Concrete sectors or firms, but much less planned system, depends on two cores to subjects whom will find some equivalents in Japan and Korea, at least:

Direct foreign investments have made 0,2 percent from total amount of investments into a fixed capital, to Taiwan (1960-85) and in Korea (1965-90) corresponding indicators have made 2,4 and 1,6 percent accordingly while in China (1980-2005) this indicator was above, than 7,0 percent.

Competitiveness, thus, as is represented, gradually leave spontaneous market forces, than in JTK

China, similar, have developed more purposeful approach to the industrial policy, paying priority attention some sectors (or "Pillars"), such as cars, the petrochemical industry, telecommunications, high technologies etc.

[Перкинс, 2001; Нотон, 2007]. In the field of electronics, in particular, the authorities have made

All possible to receive a technological transfer from the foreign enterprises, in exchange for access on the market, as for creation of joint ventures the first and national "champions"

The third basic distinction between ways of development of China and JTK.

Considering, that export successes have come from foreign and small enterprises,

Though in Japan and Korea, in particular, target the heavy industry also were possibility of gradual transition from the initial complete set of export that was or the easy industry - or natural resources, intensive, China has gone almost in the opposite direction, departs with the heavy industry which were distinctive line of its industrialisation of centralised planning of years and to light industry.

Not what you're looking for?

If this essay isn't quite what you're looking for, why not order your own custom Economics essay, dissertation or piece of coursework that answers your exact question? There are UK writers just like me on hand, waiting to help you. Each of us is qualified to a high level in our area of expertise, and we can write you a fully researched, fully referenced complete original answer to your essay question. Just complete our simple order form and you could have your customised Economics work in your email box, in as little as 3 hours.


If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows:

Essay UK, China's economic development. Available from: <> [26-07-16].

More information:

If you are the original author of this content and no longer wish to have it published on our website then please click on the link below to request removal:


Essay UK offers professional custom essay writing, dissertation writing and coursework writing service. Our work is high quality, plagiarism-free and delivered on time.

Essay UK is a trading name of Student Academic Services Limited. a company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 08866484 .

Top pages:

FREE Economic Development in China Essay

Topics in this paper Popular Topics

Economic development and growth is sought after and important to the overall development of every country on this earth. Economic development is said to be a long term phenomenon which studies how economic circumstances change over time and how they can be made to change. While there is no scientific formula that itself measures the development of one country, development usually coincides with the economic growth of a country. Economic growth said to be the result of the improvements a country makes on four key areas. These area's are saving & investments, technology and labour, resource allocation and international trade, all which are equally vital for economic development. China, which is considered a less developed country, has one of the world's fastest growing economies today. China's per capita income has gone from 478.0 Yuan in 1980 to 5,160.0 Yuan in 1997 (Findlay, 33). All four key economic growth factors are relevant when talking about the changes China has made too its agricultural sector and its rural labour arrangements. This paper will discuss how china's agricultural development and reforms have helped in the overall economic development of China.

Like other lower developed countries, China's agricultural industry has always been the engine behind its economy. Although China's agricultural share in GDP has been declining, agricultural in China still accounts for nearly 20 percent of GDP and almost 50 percent of employment, with 70 percent of the population living in rural area's (Findlay, 7). China's recent rise in agricultural production is primarily due too reform's that started to take place around the 1980's. Prior to this time, China's agricultural output decreased to the point where it was hurting China's overall economic development. There were three main reasons for this decrease: a growing population; an agricultural system which was designed to supply funds for industrially development; and r

Essays Related to Economic Development in China

Today s China Economic Development essays Today's China Economic Development

China has an ancient history and was a leading civilization of the
world for many centuries. Today's China (officially the People's Republic
of China) is the most populous country in the world (pop. over 1.3
billion) and the fourth largest in terms of area. The country has undergone
great economic changes in its modern history ranging from its transition to
a radical socialist economy following the Communist Revolution in 1949 to
the market-oriented reforms that stated in the late 1970s and continue till
1. History of Modern China's Economic Development
After decades of political turmoil and civil war between the
nationalists and the communists, the People's Republic of China was founded
in 1949 under the Communist Party of China. Led by Mao Zedong, the newly
established communist state immediately set about restoring the economy,
which had been devastated due to decades of warfare, to a working order.
This was quickly accomplished by repairing the destroyed transportation and
communication links and restoring the economic activity. The banking system
was nationalized and placed under the People's Bank of China. The monetary
system was unified, credit tightened and budgets centralized to control
inflation. Nationwide land reforms were carried out and most of the land
owned by landlords to landless peasants. Farmers were encouraged to co-
operate in some areas of agricultural production leading to the system of
"communes." ("Recovery from War," 1998)
Having established a semblance of normality, the First Five Year Plan
(1953-57) was launched to transform the country's economy on socialist
principles based on the Soviet model. The main objective of the plan was to
achieve a high rate of economic growth through emphasis on industrial
development, particularly the heavy industry. The Soviets helped China's
industrial development by providing technical advice and equipment. The
plan wa.

Related Essays:

Today's China Economic Development. (1969, December 31). In Retrieved 07:40, July 26, 2016, from

MegaEssays. "Today's China Economic Development.", (December 31, 1969). Web. 26 Jul. 2016.

MegaEssays, "Today's China Economic Development.,", (accessed July 26, 2016)

Essay on Economics

Essay/Term paper: Chinese economic reform under communist rule

Chinese Economic Reform under Communist Rule

Two years after the death of Mao Zedong in 1976, it became apparent to many of
China's leaders that economic reform was necessary. During his tenure as China's
premier, Mao had encouraged social movements such as the Great Leap Forward and
the Cultural Revolution which had had as their bases ideologies such as serving
the people and maintaining the class struggle. By 1978 "Chinese leaders were
searching for a solution to serious economic problems produced by Hua Guofeng,
the man who had succeeded Mao Zedong as CCP leader after Mao's death" (Shirk 35).
Hua had demonstrated a desire to continue the ideologically based movements of
Mao. Unfortunately, these movements had left China in a state where "agriculture
was stagnant, industrial production was low, and the people's living standards
had not increased in twenty years" (Nathan 200). This last area was particularly
troubling. While "the gross output value of industry and agriculture increased
by 810 percent and national income grew by 420 percent [between1952 and 1980].
average individual income increased by only 100 percent" (Ma Hong quoted in
Shirk 28). However, attempts at economic reform in China were introduced not
only due to some kind of generosity on the part of the Chinese Communist Party
to increase the populace's living standards. It had become clear to members of
the CCP that economic reform would fulfill a political purpose as well since the
party felt, properly it would seem, that it had suffered a loss of support. As
Susan L. Shirk describes the situation in The Political Logic of Economic Reform
in China, restoring the CCP's prestige required improving economic performance
and raising living standards. The traumatic experience of the Cultural
Revolution had eroded popular trust in the moral and political virtue of the CCP.
The party's leaders decided to shift the base of party legitimacy from virtue to
competence, and to do that they had to demonstrate that they could deliver the
goods. (23) This movement "from virtue to competence" seemed to mark a serious
departure from orthodox Chinese political theory. Confucius himself had posited
in the fifth century BCE that those individuals who best demonstrated what he
referred to as moral force should lead the nation. Using this principle as a
guide, China had for centuries attempted to choose at least its bureaucratic
leaders by administering a test to determine their moral force. After the
Communist takeover of the country, Mao continued this emphasis on moral force by
demanding that Chinese citizens demonstrate what he referred to as "correct
consciousness." This correct consciousness could be exhibited, Mao believed, by
the way people lived. Needless to say, that which constituted correct
consciousness was often determined and assessed by Mao. Nevertheless, the ideal
of moral force was still a potent one in China even after the Communist takeover.
It is noteworthy that Shirk feels that the Chinese Communist Party leaders saw
economic reform as a way to regain their and their party's moral virtue even
after Mao's death. Thus, paradoxically, by demonstrating their expertise in a
more practical area of competence, the leaders of the CCP felt they could
demonstrate how they were serving the people. To be sure, the move toward
economic reform came about as a result of a "changed domestic and international
environment, which altered the leadership's perception of the factors that
affect China's national security and social stability" (Xu 247). But Shirk feels
that, in those pre-Tienenmen days, such a move came about also as a result of an
attempt by CCP leaders to demonstrate, in a more practical and thus less
obviously ideological manner than Mao had done, their moral force. This is not
to say that the idea of economic reform was embraced enthusiastically by all
members of the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party in 1978. To a great
extent, the issue of economic reform became politicized as the issue was used as
a means by Deng Xiaoping to attain the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.
Mao's successor, Hua Guofeng, had "tried to prove himself a worthy successor to
Mao by draping himself in the mantle of Maoist tradition. His approach to
economic development was orthodox Maoism with an up-to-date, international
twist" (Shirk 35). This approach was tied heavily to the development of China's
oil reserves. "[W]hen [in 1978] estimates of the oil reserves were revised
downward[,] commitments to import plants and expand heavy industry could not be
sustained" (Shirk 35). Deng took advantage of this economic crisis to discredit
Hua and aim for leadership of the party. "Reform policies became Deng's platform
against Hua for post-Mao leadership" (Shirk 36). Given this history of economic
reform, it is evident that "under the present system economic questions are
necessarily political questions" (Dorn 43). Once Deng and his faction had
prevailed, it was necessary for some sort of economic reform to evolve. The
initial form the new economy took was not a radical one. China was "still a
state in which the central government retain[ed] the dominant power in economic
resource allocation and responsible local officials work[ed] for the interest of
the units under their control" (Solinger 103). However, as time passed, some
basic aspects of the old system were altered either by design or via the process
of what might be called benign neglect. As Shirk points out, in rural areas,
decollectivization was occurring: "decision making power [was being transferred]
from collective production units (communes, brigades, and teams) to the family"
(38); purchase prices for major farm products were increased (39). In 1985,
further reforms were introduced. For example, long-term sales contracts between
farmers and the government were established. In addition, in an effort to allow
the market to determine prices, "city prices of fruit and vegetables, fish, meat,
and eggs, were freed from government controls so they could respond to market
demand" (Shirk 39). Most importantly, "a surge of private and collective
industry and commerce in the countryside" (Shirk 39) occurred. This allowed a
great percentage of the populace to become involved in private enterprise and
investment in family or group ventures. The conditions also allowed rural
Chinese to leave the villages and become involved in industry in urban centers
(Shirk 40). The economy grew so quickly that inflation occurred and the
government had to reinstitute price controls. China's economy retains these
characteristics of potential for growth�”and inflation�”to this day. Another
important aspect of Chinese economic reform was the decision of China to join
the world economy. Deng Xiaoping and his allies hoped to effect this 1979
resolution in two ways: by expanding foreign trade, and by encouraging foreign
companies to invest in Chinese enterprises. This policy�”denoted the "Open
Policy" (Shirk 47)--was a drastic removal from the policies of Mao Zedong and,
in fact, from centuries of Chinese political culture. The Open Policy, which
designated limited areas in China "as places with preferential conditions for
foreign investment and bases for the development of exports" (Nathan 99), was
extremely successful in the areas where it was implemented (Shirk 47). However,
it was looked upon by many Chinese as nothing less than an avenue to "economic
dependency" (Nathan 50). Indeed, when the policy was first implemented, many
Chinese seem[ed] to fear that Deng's policies [were] drawing China back toward
its former semi-colonial status as a "market where the imperialist countries
dump their goods, a raw material base, a repair and assembly workshop, and an
investment center." (Nathan 51) It is interesting to note the symptoms of a
national character that would subscribe to the above sentiment. In an article
written in 1981, just two years after the Open Policy was first proposed, Andrew
J. Nathan noted the almost pathological resistance to foreign intervention in
the Chinese economy: "Some Chinese fear that reliance on imported technology
will encourage a dependent psychology. [Many] Chinese perceive joint ventures
as a costly form of acquisition. 'Some people worry: Won't we be suffering
losses by letting foreigners make profits in our country?'" (52). The Chinese
were as vociferous about issues of sovereignty. Nathan maintained that the Mao-
led revolution, which culminated in victory in 1949, had been fueled by "an
intense patriotism. once China had 'stood up,' no infringement on its
sovereignty, no matter how small, should be permitted" (53). These feelings were
manifested in denying foreign businessmen long-term, multiple entry visas,
resisting "increased foreign economic contacts" and alteration of current ways
of doing things, and disinclination to become involved in government-to-
government loans and joint ventures lest Chinese become exploited in some way
(Nathan 53-55). Given these hesitancies on the part of the Chinese society vis-
a-vis foreign relations, it is impressive that Deng and his allies were able
initially to create and implement the Open Policy since many members of the
society at large were resistant to becoming involved in a policy so antithetical
to the Chinese national character. However, once the successes of the Open
Policy were apparent, resistance to the plan by the populace waned. Moreover,
given the confluence of politics and economics in China, it seems apparent that
some members of the CCP would also not be in favor of the plan. Nevertheless,
the Open Policy was implemented and has become instrumental in the success of
the burgeoning Chinese economy. The implementation of the Open Policy was so
successful that by 1988 the leaders of the CCP were encouraged to create a new
program called the "coastal development strategy." In this program, even more of
the country was opened up to foreign investment�”an area which, at the time,
included nearly 200 million people. Moreover, by involving more overseas
investors, "importing both capital and raw materials," and "exporting China's
cheap excess labor power," the new policy was one of "'export-led growth' or
'export-oriented industrialization.' It [was] explicitly modeled on the
experiences of Taiwan and the other Asian 'small dragons'" (Nathan 99). One
analyst has maintained that "China now stands at the threshold of the greatest
opportunity in human history: a new economic era promising greater wealth and
achievement than any previous epoch" (Gilder 369). Illustrative of this
optimistic feeling is Shanghai, an area that was designated for preferential
conditions for foreign investment and as a base for the development of exports
in 1988. This city and environs in the Yangtze Delta area have a population of
approximately 400 million people and the city has become the nation's financial
hub for international and national investors. For political reasons, this area
was excluded from the original Open Policy designation in 1978, but is currently
in the process of catching up with other areas so designated. Indeed, the
increase in foreign investments in the last two years is striking. The area
received 3.3 billion dollars in foreign investments during the 1980s. The area
received the same amount from foreign investments in 1992 alone. In only the
first ten months of 1993, the area had received over six billion dollars worth
of foreign investments (Tyler A8). Western analysts have asserted that the Open
Policy and the coastal development strategy have allowed Deng to entrench his
political power (Shirk 47) and will allow his power to be sustained even after
death. If this is true, Deng should be very popular in Shanghai. With its new
designation, and with the billions of foreign dollars coming into the area, it
has become necessary to improve the city's facilities. To that end forty billion
dollars worth of public works projects have been allocated by the central
government for Shanghai within the last year (Tyler A1). These public works
projects include new sewers, a new water system, new gas lines, a new bridge,
and extensive roadwork. Future plans include the construction of a second
international airport, a container port, a new subway system, and more roads and
bridges (Tyler A8). The financial district, which will feature a new stock
exchange, is also being rebuilt by China and foreign investors in a joint
venture. By being designated for preferential conditions, Shanghai received from
the central government tax exemptions for enterprises doing business with
foreign companies, tax holidays for new factories set up with foreign
investments, and a bonded zone�”the largest in China�”for duty free imports of raw
materials. Shanghai now has all the trappings of a modern city: discos,
construction projects, and conspicuous consumption. In short, where "revered
monuments and golden arches exist side by side" (Riboud 12), the appearance of
the new Shanghai does nothing less than signal "the end of the ideological
debate over China's free market experiments" (Tyler A8). Shanghai has joined the
ranks of the modern metropolis. However, this is not necessarily a beneficial
development. Inflation is rampant: prices have doubled in the industrial zones
in the last five years. Nevertheless, the fact that Shanghai currently possesses
the fifth most expensive office space in the world demonstrates that demand is
high and that the prospects for future growth are promising (Tyler A8). Indeed,
Pudong, a free export manufacturing zone described as "the future sight of
Shanghai's Manhattan" (Tyler A8), boasts more than twenty factories built or
being built with names like Siemens and Hitachi prominent. This area has become
particularly attractive to foreign investors and companies because of its tax
concessions, duty free imports of raw materials, and cheap labor. Shanghai
stands to benefit, too, as it receives ancillary technology and discretionary
spending from the workers and executives of the companies represented (Tyler A8).
It is conditions like these that have caused at least one analyst to predict
that China will be "the richest economy in the world within the next 25 years"
(Gilder 372). Shanghai is by no means unique to this growth. Additional foreign
investments have continued to pour into other areas of China. For example, the
Boeing Company recently announced its intention to "invest $100 million in a
plant in [Xian] China to make tail sections for 737 jetliners" ("Boeing" D4). In
addition, E.I. du Pont recently predicted "that its investments and business in
China could increase as much as ten times by the end of the century" ("Du Pont"
D2). Tellingly, du Pont's chairman attributed the company's negotiations of "as
many as 28 new projects in China" to the fact "that the country's financial
changes, improved infrastructure and rising disposable income has [sic]
encouraged the company to expand its business activities" ("Du Pont" D2). The
Chinese government has made conscientious attempts to promote the strength of
the country's economy while protecting its citizens. Just a few weeks ago, the
government instituted "tight-money policies, intended to control inflation and
slow what has been the world's fastest growing major economy" (Shenon "China
Halts" D1). However, after doing so, China's Securities Regulatory Commission
was forced to stop the issuing of new issues on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock
Exchanges because the value of the markets had decreased so greatly. This latter
move was "meant to calm millions of first-time Chinese investors who evidently
went into the market believing that stock prices could only go up" (Shenon
"China Halts" D1). Might this policy show a union of economic and moral concern?
If so, it demonstrates the desire on the part of the government to show some
kind of responsibility, some moral force, to its citizenry. At the very least,
the strategy appears to show a practical desire on the part of the government to
take control over what could have been a bad economic situation. Indeed, after
these measures were instituted, China's trade deficit decreased (Hansell D2) and
the stock markets' volume attained record highs ("Stocks Surge" D2). To be sure,
Chinese investors remain somewhat wary about the stock market and, ironically
enough, more control of the stock markets appears to be necessary (Shenon "A
Nail-Biting" D1). But, in discussing Chinese attempts to control inflation,
Philip J. Suttle, head of emerging markets research at the investment firm of
J.P. Morgan, has predicted that "[i]t looks as though the Chinese are going to
have the soft landing they are aiming for" (quoted in Hansell D2). China's
interest in stock markets is no longer restricted to within its own boundaries.
This month, Shandong Huaneng Power Development Company, "the first mainland
Chinese company to have its primary listing on the New York Stock Exchange"
("China Stock" D5), began trading shares. The stock should be an attractive one
to investors: Chinese electrical "demand. is expected to grow by a whopping
17 million kilowatts a year until the turn of the century" (Zuckerman D6).
Moreover, China stands to gain from the issue's sales. "The company plans to use
the $311 million dollars it received from the offering to retire $83 million in
loans from. Chinese state entities. It also plans to expand its overall
generating capacity" (Zuckerman D6). Nor does this signify the only Chinese
attempt of raising capital from foreign sources on foreign soil. "Three more
power companies are expected to be listed in New York and Hong Kong in the
coming months" (Zuckerman D6). Given the apparent strength of the Chinese
economy as shown by huge public works projects, extensive foreign investments,
participation in the world economy, and a generally higher standard of living by
the populace, it would appear that China is now ready to join the world as a
modern capitalistic and democratic society. However, this is not quite the case.
The CCP retains vestiges of those characteristics of insularity and
intransigence as discussed by Nathan. Because of its human rights record, the
country's economic growth is being impeded. That is, the politics of China,
which have always been allied with its economics, are now restricting
international growth. The United States, especially, has been concerned with
China's treatment of political dissidents. In May, President Clinton decided to
end linking China's trade status with the United States with its record on human
rights. The president has been criticized for this because of situations like
the following: trials for "'counterrevolutionary activities' [including].
plans to use a remote-controlled airplane to drop pro-democracy leaflets over.
Tienenmen Square" ("China cracks" A13) have recently begun for fifteen
dissidents and labor organizers who were involved in the Tienenmen Square
protests. These trials have "been delayed twice, first to avoid negative
international reaction just before the decision last September on China's failed
bid to host the 2000 Olympics and then this spring to avoid influencing
Clinton's trade decision" ("China cracks" A13). In addition, China has
instituted "new laws effective in June [which] give sweeping powers to China's
State Security Bureau to clamp down on dissidents" ("China cracks" A13). China
is fully aware of United States' concerns about its human rights record. Given
the fact that the United States has made it clear to China that that record will
be allied with trade status, China's timing of such restrictive activities has
caused United States legislators and administrators to question China's
sincerity in its desire to have a favored trade status with the United States.
Indeed, just in the past few days, it took a last-minute lobbying campaign by
President Clinton and his Cabinet [to head off a] potentially embarrassing vote
by the House of Representatives to restrict trade with China as a way to punish
Beijing for reported human rights violations. (Bradsher A7) But China's problems
in joining the community of the world market have more to do than with its
political ethos and practices. China appears not to understand or to be able to
follow through on fundamental modern economic practices. For example, the United
States has recently complained that "China has not complied with international
rules on access to its markets and protection of copyrights and patents" (Gargan
14). Such non-compliance could make it difficult for China to become a founding
member of the World Trade Organization, the successor to the General Agreement
on Tariffs and Trade and the body that is intended to promote global free trade
by lowering tariffs and other barriers, [which] will be formally constituted on
January 1, 1994. (Gargan 14) The specific nature of the United States' complaint
has to do with China's pirating of musical compact disks, video laser disks and
computer software. In fact, it is estimated that such pirating costs American
companies a billion dollars a year. This phenomenon seems to have to do with the
Chinese psychology as described by Nathan. In his 1981 essay he noted that China
did not wish to become a "technological client of the west. The preferred
solution is to buy one item and copy it" (Nathan 52). Clearly, this is not the
way trade works today. It is the United States' position that China must adhere
to the rules of trade before it can be included in a trade organization.
Needless to say, exclusion from WTO would be disastrous for any country, but
particularly for an emerging market such as China. Even on a day to day basis,
China's economic leaders seem unable to understand how some aspects of a market
economy work. In discussing the status of the Shanghai Stock Market, for example,
one stock dealer referred to it as "crazy" ("Stocks Surge" D2). Moreover,
American analysts have been amazed to discover in the Shanghai market "the lack
of regulation and the poor disclosure requirements. Some companies have been
listed for two or three years and have not issued an annual report" (Hansell D2).
It is no wonder that Chinese investors become anxious about their investments.
The issuance of shares in the Shandong Huaneng Power Development Company also
demonstrates the lack of expertise on the part of the Chinese in the modern
world market. In fact, according to one Hong Kong investment analyst, "'[t]he
company wasn't really a company. It was just a bunch of discrete plants that
they tied a bow around and wrote a prospectus on'" (Zuckerman D6). The
prospectus guaranteed a fifteen percent annual return on investments. In fact,
the return will no doubt be less than that because of prevailing currency
exchange rates and debt that the company will have to assume. To be sure, the
problems of the Shandong Huaneng Power Development Company and the Shanghai
Stock Exchange may demonstrate only the problems of an immature economy.
Nevertheless, if China wishes to become a viable member of the world economic
community, such shortcomings will have to be eliminated quickly. These apparent
problems may also be the result of an economic system that is run by the state.
Certainly, one thing that the CCP has attempted to do is create a market economy
while retaining a state controlled system. This structure may be possible but it
does have its critics. Steven N.S. Cheung, in an essay written in 1989, argued
for the "creation of private property by mandate" (31), feeling that
privatization in China would lead to necessary additional investment in the
society's infrastructure and the establishment of a "judicial system that is
based firmly on the principle of equality before the law" (Cheung 32). Echoing
Cheung's sentiments, James Dorn saw problems in the areas of Chinese banking and
finance. In this arrangement, Dorn argued, "the state controls the bulk of
investment resources. The lack of a private capital market has handicapped
economic development in China and hampered rational investment decisionmaking"
(43). In order to become a modern economic state Dorn argued for the necessity
of circumventing "China's ruling elite who oppose the dismantling of state
monopolies and who benefit from price fixing and nonprice rationing" (51). Xu
Zhiming also saw the necessity for a revamping of the Chinese system: "We must
throw off the traditional system completely" (249) in order for economic reform
to thrive. Communist Party members, of course, articulate a different position.
In a recent interview that appeared in the Beijing Review, Feng Bing, Deputy
Secretary General of the State Commission for Restructuring the Economic System,
spoke to the issue of economic reform in China. It is striking that Feng spoke
of the benefits that the populace has received as a result of the economic
reform now occurring in China. That is, his comments appeared to demonstrate the
beneficence, or the moral force, of the Chinese Communist Party vis-a-vis
economic reform. He noted that such reform involves the essence of socialism:
"to liberate and develop productive forces; to eradicate exploitation; to remove
polarization; and. to attain the goal of common prosperity" ("Official" 12).
Thus, CCP leaders still appear to see their roles as representatives of a moral
force. CCP members and leaders wish economic reform not to be judged on just its
practical merits, but also as an effect of the moral force of the leadership.
Economic reform, then, becomes nothing less than a moral crusade and it is thus
easy to see why, for example, China "has staked its national prestige on
becoming a founding member of the World Trade Organization" (Gargan 14). Will
China succeed in taking its place among the nations of the world market? Will
the CCP succeed in retaining its political power given the drastic changes in
the societal makeup of China that are occurring due to the changing economic
realities? I would suggest that the chances are better for the former than for
the latter. Once the Chinese attain more sophistication relative to
international and national markets, institute a more manageable banking system,
and make a good faith effort to insure acceptable human rights, the country may
well become "the richest economy in the world within the next 25 years" (Gilder
372). However, whether or not these conditions can occur without a weakening of
the state controlled system is problematic. The most impressive and far-reaching
display of moral force by the CCP may well have to be a voluntary reduction of
its power over the people. Paradoxically, by weakening itself politically, the
party may demonstrate its true moral force by liberating, politically and
economically, one billion Chinese citizens.

"Boeing Planning to Invest $100 Million for China Plant." New York Times: 9
August 1994, D4.

Bradsher, Keith. "Bill to Restrict China's Imports Loses in House." New York
Times: 10 August 1994, A7.

Cheung, Steven N.S. "Privatization vs. Special Interests: The Experience of
China's Economic Reforms."

Economic Reform in China: Problems and Prospects. Ed. James A. Dorn and Wang Xi.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. 21-32.

"China cracks down on dissent after trade threat lifted, report says." Hartford
Courant: 29 July 1994, A13.

"China Stock Is Most Active." New York Times: 5 August 1994, D5.

Dorn, James A. "Pricing and Property: The Chinese Puzzle."

Economic Reform in China: Problems and Prospects. Ed. James A. Dorn and Wang Xi.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. 39-61.

"Du Pont Plans Increase In Chinese Investment." New York Times: 10 August 1994,

Gargan, Edward A. "U.S. May Thwart China's Trade Goal." New York Times: 24 July
1994, 14.