Essay for you

Oedipus And Hamlet Comparison Essay

Category: Essay

Description

Oedipus Rex - Compared To Hamlet Essay

Oedipus Rex – Compared To Hamlet Essay, Research Paper

In the play Hamlet: Prince of Denmark, a young prince is in search of the truth behind his father?s murder. At first, Hamlet sees the ghost of his deceased father and it tells him he was murdered by the now current king, Hamlet?s Uncle Claudius. Hamlet has to think about how he will get revenge for his fathers death, but because his only knowledge came from a ghost that only Hamlet heard speak, he is hesitant to get his revenge quickly. Hamlet does everything he can to show others the truth he knows. It is important to Hamlet that he gets revenge but he also wants to torment the king and show everyone the truth. Hamlet knows his anger toward his Uncle may cause confusion in his judgement of the truth so he is hesitant to kill him right away. Hamlet second-guesses himself throughout the play only to end up dying, but not before he kills Claudius.

In Oedipus the king, a child is born to a royal couple, this king and queen want to know how their child will be in the future. So they ask an oracle to tell them the future and it tells them he will kill his father and marry his mother. They have the child taken away to be killed, so they save themselves, but instead the child ends up in a new castle and is raised by another couple as their own child. They never tell Oedipus that he is not their own. When Oedipus hears he is to kill his father and marry his mother, he leaves his parents and searches for a new residence. Except he meets up with a man on the road and kills him. He then finds a castle that is being terrorized by a sphinx and answers the riddle it asks. He then marries the Queen and rules over the kingdom. In the end, the city is threatened by a plague that the oracle said will cease when the city gets rid of the one who murdered the king, Oedipus announces that the murderer will be punished. However, while searching for the truth Oedipus discovers that he is the murderer and the son of his wife. In the end, Oedipus finds his wife/mother hanged herself, so in the midst of all this Oedipus gouges his eyes out and banished himself from the castle.

In both these plays, truth played a major role in the outcome. Hamlet became so engrossed in the truth; he was too hesitant and continued to second-guess himself throughout the play. He may have become king but because truth was so important to him Hamlet ended up dying as well. As for Oedipus, knowing the truth may not be all it is cracked up to be. Would Oedipus have really murdered his father and marry his mother if they had not asked the oracle about the future? These plays question the power of truth but is it better to know what is lurking behind every door, or is it better to be curious about it, but never actually seek it.

Knowing the truth was very powerful in both these plays and it had a major effect on the outcomes of both stories. Maybe by knowing the future the truth is set. If the future remains unknown than so will truth. Truth was a deciding factor in both outcomes of the plays. If the truth were known earlier, it would have changed the entire aspect of each play.

 Shakespeare, William. Hamlet: Prince of Denmark.

 The Essential theatre 7th edition

 Oscar G. Brocket, Robert J. Ball. Harcourt Brace College Publishers

 Sophocles. Oedipus the King

Copyright © 2010-2016

Other articles

Oedipus And Hamlet Comparative Essay English Literature Essay

Oedipus And Hamlet Comparative Essay English Literature Essay

Oedipus and Hamlet comparative essay

Death can upset an individual even when they do not anticipate it, affecting them to search for solutions. This is seen in both the plays Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare and Oedipus written by Sophocles. Although Oedipus and Hamlet are successful in their mission, Hamlet is more successful than Oedipus due his knowledge of greater truth and patience.

Firstly, Hamlet’s knowledge of greater truth is beneficial in making him more successful than Oedipus. Comparing Hamlet and Oedipus in their quest to find the truth, Hamlet instantly accepts assistance contrary to Oedipus. Consequently, Hamlet is more successful since he heeds to the ghost of King Hamlet when the ghost tells Hamlet that his supposed death caused by the sting of a serpent is false. Following this, Hamlet pays attention to the instruction of his father in very calculated ways to find the truth about the way in which his father dies. The Ghost makes this known by saying that, "a serpent stung me, so the whole of Denmark is by a forged process of my death rankly abused; but now, thou noble youth, this serpent that did string thy father’s life Now wears my crown." (Shakespeare 1.5, 35-40). The quotation reveals Claudius as the person responsible for King Hamlet’s death. In their conversation, the ghost clarifies how Claudius is jealous of what he accomplished and also how Claudius took advantage of the fact that Gertrude was vulnerable at the time of his death. Due to his words, Hamlet vows to avenge his father’s murderer. By accepting the ghost’s confrontations, Hamlet detects the killer of his father who is his uncle making him more knowledgeable about the truth. This makes Hamlet’s knowledge of greater truth efficient because he followed his father’s ghost to find answers even when he could have died from encountering the ghost or gone mad as Horatio had predicted. Simply, though there were consequences involved he still embarks on this journey to seek the truth.

Secondly, Hamlet’s knowledge for greater truth is shown through his ability to find the letter that illustrates his death and also the ways in which he creates suspicion and anxiety in his Uncle. Hamlet makes certain pronounces about his father’s death when he acts like he is mad. He tells Horatio about his trip from Denmark to England as he explains, " my fear forgetting manners, to unseal their grand commission; where I found, Horatio, O royal knavery!-an exact command, importing Denmark’s health and England’s too, with, ho! Such bugs and goblins in my life, that, on the surprise, no leisure bated, No, not stay the grinding of axe, my head should be struck off." (5.2, 19-24). Through his pretense to be mad, Hamlet proves himself as highly knowledgeable of the truth thus the ghost’s assertion that his Uncle killed his father. At this point of the play, Claudius wants to eliminate Hamlet due to his anxiety by sending him from Demark to England to have him killed by the king of England. Though, his uncle’s argument is that Hamlet’s madness is a disgrace to the Kingdom and attempts to send him away, he only does this to prevent Hamlet from finding out the truth. However, Hamlet outsmarts Claudius by finding the letter he gives to Guildenstern and Rosencrantz. He tells Horatio about his suspicion that Claudius’s letter contains information about his death which is in Guildenstern and Rosencrantz’s bags. Hamlet being intelligent, he changes the letter to have Guildenstern and Rosencrantz killed instead. This proves Hamlet’s ability to predict the truth based on his Uncle’s attempt to kill him. In the end, Hamlet’s ability to exercise his intelligence through careful steps allows him to avoid his own death and defeat those who wanted his downfall.

On the other hand, Oedipus affronts Teiresias when he confronts him about the death of king Laius. Oedipus continues to live in denial and rejects the truth. He tells Teiresias, as blind as he is, he cannot make guesses about things to harm him or any man who sees the light. He assumes Teiresias tells him he is a killer because he wants to rip him of his position as the king of Thebes. This makes Hamlet’s more successful in his mission than Oedipus because his knowledge of greater truth. Oedipus’s ignorance leads him to his blindness of the truth when he denies the truth about the killer of king Laius and blames Creon as the plotter of his downfall. He tells Creon he is his bitterest enemy and he needs no help from him. This proves that as Hamlet accepts the ghost assistance in finding the truth, Oedipus refuses assistance from Creon and blames him as a plotter of his downfall and also, as Hamlet follows the ghost to find the truth, Oedipus rejects the truth by insulting the deliverer of the truth. This makes Hamlet more successful in his mission than Oedipus because Hamlet embraces the truth whereas Oedipus ignores it.

Hamlet is more patient than Oedipus which makes him more successful in his mission because Oedipus’s flaws compel him to make hasty decisions unlike him. At the three cross roads, Oedipus kills Laius because he is rude to him. He explains to Jocasta that, " it was the driver that thrust me aside and him I struck for I was angry; he tumbled headlong out of the carriage and every man of them there I killed." (Sophocles 798). This particularly shows Oedipus as a man whose emotions drive him to his decisions. At this point of the play, Oedipus is at the verge of finding the killer of King Laius which he thinks could be him. After denying everybody’s solution, he comes to a realization that he could be the one to face the harsh punishment of having his eyes plucked out. Sensing his own downfall, he opens up to Jocasta as he tells her about how he hastily killed some people at the three cross roads without giving it a second thought. Oedipus’s hastiness in decision making makes him less patient than Hamlet.

However, Hamlet makes his own choices about things he does which give him time to take things at his own pace making him more patient than Oedipus. Oedipus on the hand does not determine his own fate because it is predetermined by the gods. At the end of the play, Oedipus is not patient enough to analyze his whole life has been a lie and how to make things right amongst the people he offended and his children. He blames himself as he says "Alas! All out! All known, no more concealment! O light! May I never look back again, revealed as I am, sinful in my begetting, sinful in marriage, sinful in shedding blood! " (Sophocles, 58). This proves Oedipus’s way of saying, the gods are not to be blamed but rather his own deeds set the ball rolling. At this point, he realizes the woman he loves, his mother and wife is dead so he doles out punishment to himself by taking out his eyes with the idea, never to see the fruit of his sinful labour. Although Oedipus is successful in his mission, he lost his sight and everything he worked and lived for. Hamlet is more powerful in determining the course of his life making him more successful as he is able to witness the death of his Uncle at the end the play as against Oedipus whose destiny was predetermined and his actions also hastened his own downfall leading him to lose his eyesight.

In conclusion, both Hamlet and Oedipus are on the quest to find the truth. They are both on a mission to find the killer of their fathers while discovering their fates. As Hamlet seeks revenge as he struggles with the idea of killing Claudius, Oedipus offers himself to find and prosecute Laius’s murderer. Even though Oedipus and Hamlet are successful in their mission, Hamlet is more successful than Oedipus due his knowledge of greater truth and patience. This is apparent through the choices they make individually as well the actions they take towards it. Oedipus however is quick tempered as he kills Laius in an argument. Oedipus’s flaws and fate led his to self-destruction thus making Hamlet more successful than Oedipus in their missions respectively.

Place your order today

Get expert help from our experienced team of qualified UK academics

Hamlet Essays

Why Claudius, Not Hamlet, Became King of Denmark
By Michael J. Cummings. � 2004

Keen readers and audiences often ask why Claudius acceded to the throne in Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. Should not the crown have passed to the dead king’s son, Prince Hamlet?
. Not necessarily. In Denmark, the setting of the play, an elective monarchy held sway until 1660, when a hereditary monarchy replaced it. Therefore, Shakespeare’s fictional Hamlet, based on a legendary Dane of the Middle Ages, could not claim the crown as a birthright.
. In an elective monarchy, court officials–noblemen in high standing–selected the new king by vote. The son of a king was, to be sure, the prime candidate for the royal chair, and usually he won it. But the voting nobles had the right to reject him in favor of another candidate. And that was precisely what happened in fictional Elsinore. The nobles approved the king’s brother, Claudius.
. In a hereditary monarchy, the king’s oldest son automatically ascended the throne when his father died.
. But of course Danish laws do not explain why the nobles chose Claudius over Hamlet. Shakespeare offers no explanation of their vote. However, in Act V, Scene II, Hamlet refers to the election of Claudius, saying, “He that hath killed my king and whored my mother, / Popped in between the election and my hopes.” These lines appear in a passage in which Hamlet–conversing with his best friend, Horatio–is discussing Claudius’s murder plot against him and his moral right to kill Claudius. The words “my hopes” may signify that Hamlet expected to succeed his father. In the same scene of the same act, Hamlet–dying from the wound inflicted by Laertes’ poisoned-tip sword–again refers to Denmark election system when he says Fortinbras should be the new king: “But I do prophesy the election lights / On Fortinbras: he has my dying voice.”
. That he did not gain accession after the murder of his father could have been due to one or all of the following reasons: (1) Claudius actively campaigned for the kingship, winning votes by promising political favors. (2) Gertrude, eager to remarry and remain queen, campaigned on his behalf. (3) The nobles perceived Hamlet as too young and callow–and perhaps more likely to support the views of the common people instead of their views–and thus denied him succession.
. In the tale on which Shakespeare based Hamlet–Amleth. a Latin work by Saxo Grammaticus (1150?-1220?)–Feng (the character after whom Shakespeare modeled Claudius) murders his brother, King Horwendil, out of jealousy. The opening paragraph of Amleth explains the cause of the jealousy:

Horwendil, King of Denmark, married Gurutha, the daughter of Rorik, and she bore him a son, whom they named Amleth. Horwendil's good fortune stung his brother Feng with jealousy, so that the latter resolved treacherously to waylay his brother, thus showing that goodness is not safe even from those of a man's own house. And behold when a chance came to murder him, his bloody hand sated the deadly passion of his soul.–(Eton, Oliver, trans. The Danish History of Saxo Grammaticus. London: David Nutt, 1894.)


. The Amleth tale also says Feng gained favor with the nobles by telling lies: "Nor did his smooth words fail in their intent; for at courts, where fools are sometimes favored and backbiters preferred, a lie lacks not credit" (Eton).
. Throughout its history, Denmark has had three monarchical systems:
. First. In 940, Harald Bluetooth became the first king of a unified Denmark under an elective system requiring the monarch to sign a charter guaranteeing a division of power between the king and the people.
. Second. In 1660, Denmark adopted absolutism, granting the king full power, under a hereditary system conferring the right of succession on the oldest son. In 1665, a royal edict affirmed the hereditary system under the principle of primogeniture, a legal term referring to the right of the oldest son to inherit his father’s property.
. Third. In 1849, Denmark abandoned its absolutist monarchy in favor of a constitutional monarchy that invested government power mainly in the people’s representatives while retaining the king as a ceremonial figure. In 1953, Denmark granted women the right to accede to the throne.
.
.
Hamlet, Oedipus, and Freud
By Michael J. Cummings. � 2004

In an 1899 book entitled Interpretation of Dreams. Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), the founder of psychoanalysis, introduced the term Oedipus complex. This term describes a psychological stage of development in which a male child desires sexual relations with his mother or a female child desires sexual relations with her father. The child also exhibits hostility toward the parent of the same sex–a boy for the father and a girl for the mother. In normal development, a child outgrows this desire. However, in abnormal development, a child may retain his or her sexual fixation on the parent of the opposite sex.
. After Freud coined the term Oedipus complex. Shakespeare scholars noted that Hamlet exhibits the symptoms of this condition in his relationship with his mother, Gertrude, and stepfather-uncle, Claudius. In a soliloquy in Act I, Scene II, Hamlet condemns Claudius as a “satyr” and agonizes over his mother’s hasty marriage to him, saying, “O, most wicked speed, to post / With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!” Ample evidence exists elsewhere in the play to support the Freudian interpretation of Hamlet’s character while buttressing the view that Hamlet is mentally deranged.
. In coining his term, Freud drew upon the story of Oedipus in Greek mythology. Here is the story, in brief:
. An oracle warns King Laius of Thebes that his wife, Jocasta, will bear a son who will one day kill him. After Jocasta gives birth to a boy, Laius acts to defeat the prophecy. First, he drives a spike through the child's feet, then takes him to Mount Cithaeron and orders a shepherd to kill him. But the shepherd, taking pity on the baby, spares him after tying him to a tree. A peasant finds the baby and gives him to a childless couple–Polybus (also Polybius), King of Corinth, and his wife, Periboea (also Merope). They name the boy Oedipus (meaning swelled foot) and raise him to manhood.
. One day, when Oedipus visits the oracle at Delphi, the oracle tells Oedipus that a time will come when he slays his father and marries his mother. Horrified, Oedipus later strikes out from Corinth. He does not want to live anywhere near his beloved parents, Polybus and Periboea, lest a trick of fate cause him to be the instrument of their demise. What he does not know, of course, is that Polybus and Periboea are not his real parents.
. On the road to Thebes, which leads away from Corinth, Oedipus encounters his real father Laius, whom he does not recognize, and several attendants. Laius, of course, does not recognize Oedipus either. Oedipus and Laius quarrel over a triviality–who has the right of way. The quarrel leads to violence, and Oedipus kills Laius and four of his attendants.
. Outside Thebes, Oedipus encounters the Sphinx, a winged lion with the head of a woman. The grotesque creature has killed many Thebans because they could not answer her riddle: What travels on four feet in the morning, two at midday, and three in evening? Consequently, the city lives in great terror. No one can enter or leave the city.
. When Oedipus approaches the Sphinx, the beast poses the riddle. Oedipus, quick of mind, spits back the right answer: man. Here is the explanation: As an infant in the morning of life, a human being crawls on all fours; as an adult in the midday of life, he walks upright on two legs; as an old man in the evening of life, he walks on three legs, including a cane.
. Surprised and outraged, the Sphinx kills herself. Jubliant Thebans then offer this newcomer the throne of Thebes. Oedipus accepts it and marries its widowed queen, Jocasta. Jocasta is, of course, the mother of Oedipus, although no one in Thebes becomes aware of this fact until much later. Thus, the oracle's prophecy to Laius and Oedipus is fulfilled.
. Hamlet, of course, does not marry his mother. But, according to Freudian interpreters of the play, he does desire her–at least subconsciously. What is more, he solves a riddle of sorts, a homicide case, and kills his father–that is, stepfather. However, unlike Oedipus, Hamlet does not live on to anguish over the past.

FREE The Compare And Contrast Of Oedipus And Hamlet Essay

Topics in this paper Popular Topics

The Compare and Contrast of Oedipus and Hamlet

Since the beginning of time, a battle between good and evil has always been waged. This idea has been incorporated into many stories throughout the development of literature. Two classic examples of this timeless conflict are Shakespeare's Hamlet and Sophocles' Oedipus. Oedipus and Hamlet, are both exposed to incestuous marriage, and experience madness.

In the two plays, Oedipus and Hamlet are unconsciously exposed to incest. After Oedipus unknowingly kills the former king, he enters the City of Thebes after solving the Sphinx's riddle and freeing the citizens of her morbid tax, the people choose him to be their new king. Along with his kingship, he marries the former kings wife, Jocasta, who tragically, is Oedipus' true mother. Similarly, Hamlet's uncle, Claudius who also kill's the former king, by pouring poison "in the Porches  of his ears while he lay asleep in the garden (1.5.63). Then marries the queen, Gertrude, being the mother of Hamlet: Hamlet states, " the funeral baked meats/Did coldly furnish forth the marriage tables  (1.2. 180-81). Here, Hamlet is saying that the food that was served at his father's funeral was still fresh enough to serve at his mother and uncle's wedding, indicating their wedding was too soon after the death of the king. Although Oedipus and Jocasta's marriage was incestuous, they did not know that the prophecies were true. Oedipus tells Jocasta, "He said that I would be my Mother's lover, show offspring to mankind they could not look at, and be his murderer whose seed I am  (2. 796-799). Claudius and Gertrude were very aware of their incestuous marriage, and Oedipus and Jocasta were not.

Both Oedipus and Hamlet experience a kind of madness. Oedipus, after realizing he killed the former king and married his mother, went crazy:

This Essay is Approved by Our Editor Essays Related to The Compare And Contrast Of Oedipus And Hamlet

Comparing Oedipus and Hamlet comparison compare contrast essays

Free Essays brought to you by spymobile.pw

Free Essays - Oedipus vs. Hamlet as Tragic Protagonists


Oedipus fits Aristotle's definition of the tragic flaw and protagonist almost flawlessly. Aristotle described the protagonist as "someone regarded as extraordinary rather than typical. "(1117). Oedipus freed Thebes from the Sphinx by solving her riddle-- something nobody else had been able to do. The priest in the first scene of Act I calls Oedipus ". our greatest power" (1121) and describes him as rated first among men.

Hamlet is of noble birth but there is nothing else extraordinary about him. Unlike Oedipus, he had not saved a kingdom; he just happened to be born a prince. In tragedies the protagonists are usually of the nobility to make their falls seem greater. However, Aristotle said "What is finally important is not so much the protagonist's social stature as a greatness of character. " (1117).

Protagonists, as described in our book, must also have a "determination to meet some goal or task to make them admirable"(1118). Oedipus set about to find the killer of King Laius to free Thebes from plagues. Hamlet's goal was to avenge the murder of his father. Oedipus immediately began to look for the killer, even when the evidence pointed to himself and ruined his life. Hamlet seems to put off killing Claudius. He chose not to murder him as he prays is Act III scene iii. In Act III scene i Hamlet says: " I'll observe his looks: I'll tent him to the quick: if 'a do blench, I know my course. The spirit I have seen may be a devil:"(1315) Even after the ghost tells Hamlet how he was murdered, Hamlet has the players act it out just to be sure. Obviously, there is no hard resolution for him to finish his task.

Arthur Miller has said "tragic feeling is evoked in us when we are in the presence of a character who is ready to lay down his life. "(1988) Hamlet was ready to take a life; he had not planned on dying. He was bent only on revenge and acting only for himself. Oedipus tore out his own eyes due to his shame of what he had done. Moreover, he banished himself from his homeland so the people of his kingdom could stop their suffering.

Comparison: Hamlet & Oedipus Rex essays

MegaEssays.com Comparison :Hamlet & Oedipus Rex

Tragedy can occur no matter what one does to try to prevent it. Whether one tries to act to avoid a tragedy, or does not act to avoid it, tragedy will happen anyway. In Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, Oedipus tries to avoid tragedy by running away from it, but it does not work; in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet also tries to avoid tragedy, but he does it by not acting on the task assigned to him. Though William Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex are both similar, in that they are both examples of a classic tragedy, they have a major vital difference that Hamlet is a tragedy of inaction and Oedipus is a tragedy of action.

To compare any two things, one must first check that there is any similarity between the two; both Hamlet and Oedipus Rex conform to the same classic tragic formula. In both William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet is a member of the royal family and in fact is next in line to the throne: “You are the most immediate to our throne”[1]. We see from this quote that Claudius, the then current king of Denmark, has maintained that Hamlet will remain heir to the throne. This Hamlet as the second most powerful man in Denmark, because to anger him now, is to invoke a king’s anger in the years to come. However in Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex, Oedipus is (as the title suggests) “ruler [king] of Thebes”[2], also he clearly states that his high position in the social hierarchy by saying “I am, myself, world-famous Oedipus”[3]. One, therefore, knows that Oedipus is in high standing in both the political and the social hierarchy of the times because he is both a king and world famous. But the classic tragic formula not only needs a hero who is in a position of high status, but also to have the same hero fall from that position of status. In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet dies “O, I die, Horatio; the potent poison quite o’ercrows my spirit”[4] and then his (Hamlet’s) kingdom is taken over.

Related Essays:

Comparison :Hamlet & Oedipus Rex. (1969, December 31). In MegaEssays.com. Retrieved 01:30, July 25, 2016, from http://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/89465.html

MegaEssays. "Comparison :Hamlet & Oedipus Rex." MegaEssays.com. MegaEssays.com, (December 31, 1969). Web. 25 Jul. 2016.

MegaEssays, "Comparison :Hamlet & Oedipus Rex.," MegaEssays.com, http://www.megaessays.com/viewpaper/89465.html (accessed July 25, 2016)

Oedipus and hamlet comparison essay

Compare/Contrast Hamlet to Oedipus

Oedipus and Hamlet. Comparison

Oedipus and Hamlet are two great tragic heroes in literature Sophocles and Shakespeare made use of almost all the basic elements of tragedy while writing two of the best tragedies. Oedipus Rex and Hamlet There are many similar and dissimilar qualities in Oedipus and Hamlet These two characters belong to two dissimilar periods and social conditions. A critical evaluation of Hamlet and Oedipus to highlight the similarities and differences in their character is the essence of this br

Oedipus lived in the time of Greek gods. Rashness in

action incestuous relationships and destructive temperaments were part of the lifestyle of the people during those days. Therefore. there is no surprise in the way Oedipus jumps into action. In the case of Hamlet Catholicism in him sobers his attitudes. He also happened to be a scholar. a student of philosophy. Hence. he knows that all thoughts particularly which lead to serious actions. must be scrutinized to avoid moral consequences. This is generally taken as his weakness. as his tragic flaw. and the cause of his own tragedy. Oedipus. being a ruler does not have to think of the moral scruples as Hamlet does. He depends on public opinions. Therefore. Hamlet 's pensive nature has a noble element in it. Basically. he is a philosopher and not a fit instrument to kill anyone. Oedipus has no inner obstacles. and he is emotional and passionate. He is also impatient and cannot wait till full investigation of the murder is.

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay ( only for $12.99 )

More Papers on hamlet, oedipus, compare, Shakespeare, University Press

Classic Character Comparison between Hamlet and Oedipus

The essays are ideal for those taking examinations in English Literature.

Home » World Literature » Classic Character Comparison between Hamlet and Oedipus

Classic Character Comparison between Hamlet and Oedipus

In the play Hamlet: Prince of Denmark, a young prince is in search of the truth behind his father¡¦s murder. At first, Hamlet sees the ghost of his deceased father and it tells him he was murdered by the now current king, Hamlet¡¦s Uncle Claudius. Hamlet has to think about how he will get revenge for his fathers death, but because his only knowledge came from a ghost that only Hamlet heard speak, he is hesitant to get his revenge quickly. Hamlet does everything he can to show others the truth he knows. It is important to Hamlet that he gets revenge but he also wants to torment the king and show everyone the truth. Hamlet knows his anger toward his Uncle may cause confusion in his judgement of the truth so he is hesitant to kill him right away. Hamlet second-guesses himself throughout the play only to end up dying, but not before he kills Claudius.

In Oedipus the king, a child is born to a royal couple, this king and queen want to know how their child will be in the future. So they ask an oracle to tell them the future and it tells them he will kill his father and marry his mother. They have the child taken away to be killed, so they save themselves, but instead the child ends up in a new castle and is raised by another couple as their own child. They never tell Oedipus that he is not their own. When Oedipus hears he is to kill his father and marry his mother, he leaves his parents and searches for a new residence. Except he meets up with a man on the road and kills him. He then finds a castle that is being terrorized by a sphinx and answers the riddle it asks. He then marries the Queen and rules over the kingdom. In the end, the city is threatened by a plague that the oracle said will cease when the city gets rid of the one who murdered the king, Oedipus announces that the murderer will be punished. However, while searching for the truth Oedipus discovers that he is the murderer and the son of his wife. In the end, Oedipus finds his wife/mother hanged herself, so in the midst of all this Oedipus gouges his eyes out and banished himself from the castle.

In both these plays, truth played a major role in the outcome. Hamlet became so engrossed in the truth; he was too hesitant and continued to second-guess himself throughout the play. He may have become king but because truth was so important to him Hamlet ended up dying as well. As for Oedipus, knowing the truth may not be all it is cracked up to be. Would Oedipus have really murdered his father and marry his mother if they had not asked the oracle about the future? These plays question the power of truth but is it better to know what is lurking behind every door, or is it better to be curious about it, but never actually seek it.

Knowing the truth was very powerful in both these plays and it had a major effect on the outcomes of both stories. Maybe by knowing the future the truth is set. If the future remains unknown than so will truth. Truth was a deciding factor in both outcomes of the plays. If the truth were known earlier, it would have changed the entire aspect of each play.

Please do not pass this sample essay as your own, otherwise you will be accused of plagiarism. Our writers can write any custom essay for you!

  • The Birth of Kings Two plays, «Hamlet», written by William Shakespeare and «Oedipus Rex», written by Sophocles share a common bond of illusion and innocence. The protagonists in both plays appear at the beginning only to have changed so that reality has broken through the illusion with less than desirable results for either. In these two plays, two kings
  • The play «Oedipus Rex» is a very full and lively one to say the least Everything a reader could ask for is included in this play. There is excitement, suspense, happiness, sorrow, and much more. Truth is the main theme of the play. Oedipus cannot accept the truth as it comes to him or even where it comes from. He is blinded in his own life, trying to ignore the
  • In Hamlet, Prince of Denmark and Oedipus The King The plays of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark and Oedipus the King, are very similar in plot because they both are about the kings of their perspective cities being murdered, and the murderer subsequently is crowned king and marries the queen. They are also based on an incestuous relation with the queen. The plays differ in
  • Oedipus The King a Tangled Web Sample essay topic, essay writing: Oedipus The King-a Tangled Web - 660 words The choir represents the voice of the people, the voice of the masses. People often conform to this uniform truth, they want to be like other people. This conformation leads to a uniform voice from the public. This voice is oftenignorant to the
  • Oedipus Rex 4 Sample essay topic, essay writing: Oedipus Rex 4 - 513 words Essay - Oedipus the King by Sophocles According to Aristotle, the protagonist in a tragedy must have a tragic flaw that ultimately becomes the cause of his ruin. Oedipus in Oedipus the King by Sophocles tragic flaw that caused his downfall was his pride. Three

12 July 2014. Author: Criticism