Free Essays on My Favourite Personality Quaid e Azam Essay. Get help with your writing. 1 through 30 Free Essays on Essay On My Favourite Actor Aamir Khan. Get help with your writing. 1 through 30 What benefit do you get by learning the subject? - Helps to develop my power of thinking and judging - widens the outlook. · My hobbies Almost everybody has some kind of hobby. My hobbies are listening to music and watching television. I am very fond of music. When I am free, I. Phillip Toledano Photography. You need to upgrade Flash Player to view Phillip Toledano - Days with My Father. My favorite game/sport (Essay 1) The outline: 1. Name of game 2. How famous it is 3. How it is played 4. Why I enjoy playing it 5. The end My most favorite. Hey, my favourite meal is lunchwhen prepared by my sweet mom. I don't like fast food because a stranger will never observe hygiene and cleanliness. For me, my best friend is my own cousin. Named Azilah Syuhada, she is in the same age as me. Maybe because of that, we get closer easily compared to the others. Hi! I'm perfect, thanks:-). My favourite TV programs're American TV shows mostly, like Gossip Girl, Gilmore Girls, One Three Hill, Pretty Little Liars etc. Essay On Narendra Modi. Speech on My Favourite Politician. Prime Minister Of India Speech Narendra Modi Related Questions :-Narendra Modi Essay.
Apache/2.2.22 (Debian) Server at surpriznn.ru Port 80
What's that you say? There's no such thing as a good politician. A good politician by your standards implies a breed as rare as the California Condor ”or as some of my colleagues might contest, as extinct as the Dodo.
I beg to differ. A good politician, by definition, is someone who is a good politician not necessary a good politician. The emphasis is all.
A good politician is someone who knows how to play the political game. He knows how to make deals over one table, then undercuts it by slicing it away beneath the next one. He is a smooth talker who could convince you that life on Mars exists “ if only because we haven't been able to prove otherwise. He is a Washington insider who wears scandal like an old suit and makes it look like Hugo Boss. Most politicians can only dream of reaching this level “ the good politician has exemplified it. And it ain't easy.
The good politician is an expert at public speaking. He has charisma, charm, and those boy-next-door golden looks that make women swarm and men wish that they could be him ”and when he speaks, words drip off his tongue like honey off a bagel. A tad too sweet, nothing but empty calories, sticky and tough to clean off ¦yet the crowds will cheer his name, call for more, and not realize that he's actually calling for the development of all national parks, the dissolution of the American family, recognition of fringe groups ¦or worst of all, that he's actually saying nothing at all. No matter, because they will forgive him anything.
Which is good. Because the good politician needs a lot of forgiveness. After all, he's constantly embroiled in one scandal or another, from affairs of the boardroom to affairs of the bedroom and every scandal in between. Insider trading? Not a concern. Government contracts to former companies? It's encouraged. Favors for specific votes on CThis Essay is Approved by Our Editor Essays Related to Good Politician
A potential for conflict between the Society and politicians is identified and discussed. The general principles on which any such conflict should be resolved is then set out.
The Society of HumanKind is a world-wide organisation based on local groups and communities. As such it has many parallels with the political structure of our world. Although the Discourse of the first founding book, 'Foundations', makes it clear that the Society cannot replace, and therefore should not seek to supplant, those political institutions, it does not go on to discuss the relationship between the two. It is as well to take the opportunity to make some comment on that question in these Essays. If neglected it may provide a fertile source for conflict and misunderstanding.
The potential for conflict arises from an overlap between the area of interest of the Society and that of politicians. Both politicians and the Society have an abiding concern with the structure of our social order, in how we maintain stable co-operative social relationships and cope with the problems of balancing group and individual interests; long and short term objectives; order and liberty, and the host of other conflicts which the communal habits of our species generate.
However, the shared interest of the Society and politicians can never result in their developing a common view of these problems, because they approach that shared ground from totally different directions. The emergence of the Aim, Duty and Responsibility of the Society owes nothing to the political ambition to reform or restructure our social relations. Those three statements are solely an attempt to set out a meaning and purpose of our lives that does not depend on any belief in God, his competitors, or any other form of predestination for humanity.
The differences between the Society and politicians can be summarised. The Society is concerned with the outcome of our social structures, and the processes and relationships derived from them, rather than their form. Whereas for the politician form is likely to be of much more importance, and may indeed be the prime concern. It may, for instance, be of burning importance to a politician that our social system and structures should conform to some political theory or principle (free enterprise, democracy, socialism, etc.). To the Society however, all that matters is the effect of the system; does it provide a safe and stable environment for our infinite survival, and allow for our progress?
The reason for the interest of the Society and politicians in our social life may be different, but the impulse to intervene is common. Herein lays the source of potential conflict. Politicians may wish to change a well-established and stable social system because they disagree with the form of its structure. The Society however, would oppose that action as an unnecessary disturbance of our social order whose benefits are hardly ever likely to justify the risk. Indeed, almost as a general rule, the impulse of the politician is to innovate and change, while the Society will tend toward restraint and conservation.
Many possible conflicts of this type may therefore be imagined. Yet they must all be resolved since the Society cannot allow itself to become a source of friction or division within our species. Which gives a clue to the inevitable answer and draws attention to the importance of the Principle of Progress, and particularly the Principle 3.2 in this regard. Applying that Principle to this problem the Society will conclude that, whenever the Society or any part of its membership finds its debate with the political structures of our societies in danger of degenerating into forceful conflict, the well of uncertainty should be drawn upon. Then any risk to the stability of our social order will be removed by the Society conceding the battlefield to its opponents.
That should be the case even where concession results in damage to the Condition of the Dogma that requires the Society to maintain continuous growth in human knowledge, and not excluding harm which is so extensive that our knowledge stagnates or is actually diminished. However bleak the immediate prospect for the growth of our knowledge may be, the Society can legitimately contain itself in patience in the hope of better times to come, a position more fully argued and documented in the Essay on Life. These are circumstances however, in which it would be proper for the Society to exert its full power and influence, short of precipitating an internecine confrontation, in an effort to maintain that Condition of the Dogma.
The Society will take a different view however, of any political action which threatens the survival of our species. Then the Society must not withdraw its opposition even at the risk of a forceful reaction by its opponents. It is difficult to imagine circumstances that might give rise to this possibility, but it is at least conceivable that a political, or perhaps some other, movement may arise that is dedicated to the destruction of humanity, or any extinction level proportion of it, or which adopts a course of action that must necessarily have that effect. If such a suicidal movement emerges then the Society will have no choice other than to embark on whatever course of action is necessary to frustrate it in its purpose. Consistent that is, with the ultimate survival of our species, which must always remain the overriding objective of any action taken by the Society.
The Society assumes an awesome moral burden when it embarks on conflict with politicians, but to fail to act with vigour and promptitude to defend and further its Aim would be to betray its Responsibility, both to its predecessors and to posterity. The hope must be that the Society will always find means to avoid such dangerous confrontations. For that reason, every Council and Committee of the Society must constantly be on guard to anticipate and forestall political developments contrary to its Aim, before the point of conflict is reached.
As so often is the case with the questions examined in this collection of Essays, many difficult decisions in the field of political activity must be left to be made by those who have no choice other than to face them. The advice and prescriptions here set out contain much that can be read as requiring the Society to monitor and to judge our politicians and the structures and systems they create. The reader will, recognise however, that in all the effort to clarify the view of the Society on the proper relationship between politicians and the Society, this Essay contains no element of moral judgement on politics in any of its many manifestations.
That indeed exemplifies the differences in the approach of the Society and politicians to their common ground. It is not the manner of the actions of politicians, or their motivation, that should concern the Society. It is solely the likely consequences of what they propose or intend to do.
My favorite politician is Hillary Clinton. She is a rare and beautiful example of consistency and reasonableness in decision making. I am really impressed by her ability to face the hard times and hard opponents, as well as strict laconic and restraint style of her wardrobe. I believe her to be one of the most influential politicians in the world and a very likely candidate for the presidency of the United States.
I think that a politician should embody stability and reliability. Someone might argue that extravagant personality and extraordinary actions also have their fans, but, to be frank, those few politicians who are prone to excess rarely achieve truly impressive success in the political arena. From this perspective, Hillary Clinton is an ideal political figure.
When choosing clothes, she always prefers the classics. Most often, we see her in public and official meetings, so the usual “uniform” of Hillary Clinton is a laconic suit. Smooth matte fabric, with no visible weave or excess shine, restrained color, cool beige or gray, straight or slightly fitted cut. If you believe that it is a simple and obvious choice, remember the many sad examples of politicians, both men and women who manage to mess up the most expensive suits with completely inappropriate accessories, lurid decor or a tie with color of the scorching sun.
Most often we see her in all shades of gray (from light and almost white pearl undyed wool to more saturated colors of graphite). Other colors, obviously being in display – light beige.
Here Hillary Clinton chooses not warm shades of coffee, sandy and milk chocolate, but cold cocoa and dark chocolate. As additional accents Mrs. Clinton prefers burgundy, gray-pink or lilac. Of course, Hillary Clinton is not sinless. Her most common mistake is inappropriate combination of black and white colors. It should be again noted that the combination of a black suit and white shirt looks just old-fashioned and has nothing to do with “Chanel style” and a little black dress. In addition, each person who loves such combinations should bear in mind that such combinations make most women look old, makes them look tired.
Although the traditional English collar and long, narrow lapels are certainly not abandoned by Clinton forever, here we have a perfect example of how, without violating the requirements of etiquette, you can experiment with the elements of a cut and finish.
What else can diversify minimalistic business wardrobe. Of course, the right jewelry.
Here Hillary Clinton also demonstrates a subtle sense of proportion. Firstly, we have not seen her wearing more than two jewelry. As a rule, Mrs. Clinton chooses brooches – traditional for many women politicians. Sometimes, Hillary Clinton wears earrings. And then, and another is always a simple geometric shape, white gold or platinum, with a splash of pearls or transparent gemstones. As we can see, this is quite enough to give the image of femininity and emphasize the social status.
And the last. Hillary Clinton was not always that way. I had seen her early photos, where she looked like a typical American housewife in the old-fashioned tortoiseshell glasses, with dark curly hair, wearing a sweater with a high neck. These photos – the best proof that beauty – is primarily a man-made work and everyday hard work. So, nothing is impossible, and change – task that depends only on us.
Narendra Modi / Narendra Damodardas Modi is the 15th and current Prime Minister of India. in office since 26 May 2014. Modi, a leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), was the Chief Minister of Gujarat from 2001 to 2014 and is the Member of Parliament (MP) from Varanasi. He led the BJP in the 2014 general election, which gave the party a majority in the Lok Sabha (the lower house of the Indian parliament) – a first for any party since 1984 – and was credited for October 2014 BJP electoral victories in the states of Haryana and Maharashtra.
Born of Narendra Modi. Favourite Politician
Modi was born on 17 September 1950 to a family of grocers in Vadnagar, Mehsana district,Modi was raised in a small town in northern Gujarat, and he completed an M.A. degree in political science from Gujarat University in Ahmadabad. He was the third of six children born to Damodardas Mulchand and Heeraben Modi. As a child Modi helped his father sell tea at the Vadnagar railway station, and later ran a tea stall with his brother near a bus terminus. He completed his higher secondary education in Vadnagar in 1967.
Essay On Narendra Modi |Narendra Modi – My favorite Politician | my favorite minister-Narendra Modi | Narendra Modi Essay In Hindi | Essay on Prime MinisterJourney From Tea Vendor to Prime Minister of India How Narendra Modi Became Politician ?
He joined the pro-Hindu Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) organization in the early 1970s and set up a unit of the RSS’s students’ wing, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, in his area. Modi rose steadily in the RSS hierarchy, and his association with the organization significantly benefited his subsequent political career.Works of Narendra Modi. Thus My Favorite Politician
He became CM of Gujarat state and just make all happy and do many successful programmer and helped people so that people believe him. He is very hard working man he always wake up at 4 and do yoga so he has not forgotten his culture. He also do all his meetings and give Narendra Modi Speech and never look tired he does his job very well. The other countries also invite him and also wanted to work with him. He boosted up out tourism and out relation with other nation as well. Narendra Modi’s speech was awesome on the occasion of national festivals.Why Narendra Modi is My Favorite Politician ?
Modi has given many jobs to unemployed people of India. And now he is willing to make India advance by making internet everywhere available for that he willingly wanted to work with Google and Facebook. He also uses twitter which is a strong medium to connect with people. He also encourages all the sports persons as well soldiers. He spends almost all festivals with Indian army.
He sat an example that anyone can do anything only it require a strong will power. And he is the best example of it. He started his journey as a son of tea seller and now he has become a prime minister of the country. He loves his mother so much and always go and bow down his mother.
Modi also has helped many poor farmers and other poor people in India he has almost eliminated water problem in India also he is very good at constructing of infrastructure of India. Now he has started “make in India ” program. In which he allow us to make things in India not to use foreign products so that we will benefited and India become one of the greatest country .he says that if you put one step ahead so think 125 million feet when step forward then no one can stop us from progressing. Thus Narendra Modi is My Favourite Politician .
He is the greatest sons that mother India has.Biography Of Narendra Modi Important Points To Remember about Narendra Modi’s Biography
Politicians Essay, Research Paper
In politics it would be novel to have a gracious rival. Modern political campaigners might take a lesson in graciousness and kindness from the great British statesman, Edward Campbell. Once when Campbell was opposing Thackereay for a seat in Parliament, the two contenders, in course of their campaigning, met and engaged in friendly conversation. On taking leave of his rival Thackereay remarked, ‘May the best man win!’ ‘Oh, no,’ replied Campbell, ‘I hope not, I want to win!’ E.J. Dionne Jr. author of They Only Look Dead, ascertains that politics in America today are nothing more than ‘politics of moral annihilation’. As an example of this he refers to the presidential election of 1992. Normally. press conferences are called when political matters arise. The conference mentioned was called by the conservatives. Paula Jones came forward and accused Bill Clinton of sexual harassment; apparently Mr. Clinton made ‘unwelcomed sexual advances”. He continues to point out that these are the same conservatives that only a few years earlier had denounced the idea of sexual harassment as ‘feminist invention’. It is acts like this that are aiding in the ‘moral annihilation’ of politics. The overall impact of such politics is undermining the intelligence of the American populous by turning political campaigning into a childlike power struggle. Both the Democrats and Republicans have reverted to a state of guerrilla media warfare.Every time election year rolls around we begin to hear the usual complaints of how politics is morally corrupt. It typically means we get to see the superficial image-oriented campaigning, negative attacks against one’s opponent, and the thirty-second spot commercials that intrr upt our favorite sitcom. Experts note that the rates of political participation in the United States, as measured by the percentage of eligable voters who register and actually cast their ballot, has been dropping for years, in part due to the fact that citizens are disgusted with the conduct of political campaigns. From this we can clearly see overall impact of this type of politics does infact undermind how the populus acts in 3 ways: 1)don’t watch televison2)don’t care and 3)don’t vote.This then brings us to the second point of how this is harmful to democracy. As I stated before it turns political campaigning into a childlike game for power. Author Daniel O’Connell once said: ‘A politican doesn’t stand on his own record; he jumps on the other fellows. An example of this in Dionne’s book is the Senate election in Virgina. Oliver North ran an commercial that talked about Senetor Chuck Robb:’Why can’t Chuck Robb tell the truth? About the cocaine parties where Robb said he never saw drugs-then four of his party friends were sent to prison for deaing cocain. Or about a beauty queen in the hotel room in New York. Robb says it was only a massage. ‘Chuck Robb lived a lie and violated his oath of good faith to the people,’ writes Richmond Times-Dispatch. Character counts, and North has it all over Robb.Dionne then points out that Robb replies ever so quickly with an ‘tag, your it’ ad, claiming that North has told so many lies, ‘…people wonder does North even know what the truth is.’ It is these childlike games for power that causes people to question the validity of politics itself. Both Oliver North and Chuck Robb lacked political insight and only hindered the citizen’s of Virginia right to democracy. It begins in one state and soon will spread throghout the United States. Dionne unfortuatly points out that due to moral annihilation, democracy is already is being harmed.This now bring us to the third and final point. What have both Democrats and Republicans done or failed to due that has encouraged the ‘Politics of Annihilation’Democrats problems started in the late 1970’s. At this time government was becoming less and less popular. The government had to much control over the people. Thus the Democrats capitalized and swayed middle-class. In truth, Democrats according to Dionne ‘really did support expansive governent.’ They have never had any problems taking cheap shots at Republicans (ie. social security, Medicare, and even school lunch programs). The overall effect has become less and less each year. During the Regan years Democrats have had their ego’s literally dismantled. Because of this Democrats have the problem of being both for and against big government.As for the Republicans it has become easier to place blame for ‘moral annihilation’. Dionne points out that the one of the main issues in politics involves understanding morality itself. Sociologist James Davidson Hunter made it known at the 1992 Republican National Connvention that there are battles within the elephant camp, because of this there is a lack of respect within. In Today’s world a politican thinks of the next election; a statesmen of the next generation. To preserve peace, we need guns of smaller and men of larger caliber.But more importantly for myself I seek a candidate that sees the world as I do. I beilve Professor David Tabb summed it up in the statement: ‘I don’t care what you (the candidate) can do for everyone, but what can you do to for me.’
The world “politics” represents the diverse world of relationships, activities, behavior, orientation, views and communication links regarding government and governance. The main subject of the politics is the social (ethnic) group with its political organizations, institutions, movements and leaders. The purpose of the politics is to guide public development in a positive direction by identifying common objectives and ways of achieving them.
Politics is a science and an art. It was considered a science since the time the mankind developed the laws of social development, which influenced the political life. Politics can also be viewed as an art and it has to deal with the subjective side of the political process and involves the use of experience, intuition, creative courage and imagination.
The term “politics” was introduced by the Greek philosopher Aristotle, who defined it as is a civilized form of community that serves the “common good”. It can also be translated from Greek as “an art of government”. It is aimed at normalizing relations between the different social groups in order to determine the objectives, forms and content of state activity.
Politics is an integral part of modern society and has a complex, multi-dimensional structure. The target of politics is the various social groups – classes, community, international organizations, political parties, foundations, forms of government, and so on. These are all the structures that are able to operate freely and independently. These organizations carry certain information and their functions are not identical.
The main goal of politics is the world peace. However, peace is not merely the absence of violence; it goes much further. Peace can be granted only when justice is done everywhere. It is a utopia that can never be reached on Earth. In spite of this, the aim and objective of politics is to work in this direction and make sure that people live in peace and freedom. Every political system, every organization of power is imperfect and temporary. Any attempt to create an ideal society fails and leads to the limits of power.
Politics has nothing to do with the notion of harmony of the left and right-wing ideologies. Politics means fighting and arguing, not only in hopes of finding the best solution, but also in relation to the fundamental issues. The recent debate about the limits and possibilities of genetic engineering can serve as a good example.
Why every system is imperfect and temporary? The main reason is the freedom and creativity of people. Inventions and new technology make the further development possible. The demography, the environment, the trends are constantly changing and so does the politics.Need custom paper on Political Science? We Deliver Top Quality On Time As Promised!
Ready to get started? Just click the button to be directed to a secure page so you can enter the details of your paper
Top reasons to choose our writing service
To write a politics essay is not a very difficult task. There is so much literature available that make writing a politics essay an easy task. Politics is the process by which groups of people make collective decisions. The term is generally used to refer to the state politics, but it has been observed that other groups and organisations have politics too and this increases the scope of political essay writing. Politics essays could be easily written about the politics in the government and if you venture a little more, you could write politics essays even about politics in corporate, academic and religious institutions where it is very much prevalent. Politics essay topics are very common in academic databases and libraries and also, these politics essays are generally very useful to students of law and politics.Women in Politics Essays
When we come across a political essay, the first thing that probably comes to our minds is the government. But a political essay may not always be about the politics involved in the government. Talking about politics essay topics, there are a few politics essays that are quite interesting like a “women in politics essay”. Skilled writers have the expertise in the subject and writing and can help you with well written politics essays.Political Socialization Essay Writing
Political correctness is of very great importance to almost all politicians. There are a lot of articles like a political correctness essay which talk about how to be politically correct and what it means to be politically correct. The political essays require that the writer is also politically correct about the facts in the essay. You can use the help of professional writers in order to get this aspect of your political essays right. Politics essays that talk about being politically correct are in great demand as these political essays give a lot of information about how to make statements or form ideas that do the least offence to people of all races and creeds.
There is also a “political socialization essay” which tells you about how children and adolescents acquire political cognition, behaviour and attitudes. Related readings: explanatory essay writing, cause and effect essay assistance and comparison essay writing help.
Almost every essay about politics gives us new insights into the world of politics. To write political essays, it is necessary for you to be an expert in the subject yourself and this requires adequate research. You could also buy good political essays written by experts online.
If somehow you haven't found the desired type of service,
don't fall into despair in advance! Just contact Bookwormlab.com
and we will find a professional writer, capable of dealing with your specific assignment!
Choosing Bookwormlab.com for an academic assistance is a good call any way you slice it! We don't just promise things, we actually deliver professional help absolutely risk free. Our power lies not so much in our strengths, as in how we use them. Along with outstanding quality and rich experience, strong customer service culture is what brings us as close as possible to fulfilling your needs to a high standard. Therefore, our result is your full and complete satisfaction. Bookwormlab.com is truly devoted to its clients, so just stay with us and we will make sure you never regret turning to us for help!
This website and its content is copyright of © Bookwormlab.com 2014. All rights reserved.